The Television & Radio Database

Home  
Members  
Join  
Search  
Listings  

Just A Minute

JAM Series | JAM Stats | JAM Today | JAM Group

Search the JAM Yahoo Group Archive:

 
<<<<   10887   >>>>

Re: The new Jam Jar

Messages in this topic: 8 View All
nylonJun 21, 2016
 
 
Yes. The problem with sorting into subfolders is that detail is made less accessible. E.g. If you have 74 folders for series, you need to enter 74 folders individually to check for dupes. I'm hoping to make the Megajar as zero-maintenance as possible.

What do you other Jammers think? Subfolders? If so, what hierarchy?
How will most people access downloads, or search for content?

Mark

On Tuesday, 21 June 2016, drling0@... [just-a-minute] <just-a-minute@...> wrote:
 

Mark
As soon as I made my post, I had the same question as you.  My first thought was by series but that may be more work.  Then I thought of folders named by series AND date - and I thought that would be even more work.  Then I got a bit of a headache.

After checking out your site I opened a free mega account to give it a try.  I am currently getting upload speeds of about 60 kb/s which is not too bad.  Just drag and drop the files and then go and make a cup of tea.

Thanks for your work

David



--

Mark
mark at nylon dot net
http://nylon.net


 
<<<<   10887   >>>>

Back to the Top
 

Message History

 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
201910231211351191231414
201847218937951925514
20174342212172041923442316
201613493957608710322412923
201551973249415420280143116
201497568332833528251323879
2013463251988781192889886385427
2012921211801991258871155118166125144
20111127871731342252521526218316563
20101421171539469496918382716875
200967454297901491107063423539
2008200120175120701098711571455838
2007165447132999557140118748812599

|   FAQ   |   Contact   |   Services   |   Terms   |   Privacy   |   Credits   |

[Page generated in 0.0815 seconds under 6.08% server load]

© 2012-2025 TVRDb.com. All rights reserved.