Having listened to most of the existing JAMs it occured to me that I
could not recall a single instance in which the morose Mr Freud made
explicit reference to his celebrated forebear (save for a round where
he responded to a comment made by Derek Nimmo about Sigmund's beard,
or lack of one).
This surprises me as Clement has very definite form when it comes to
discussing his children, wife, brother, etc on the show. Was he keen
to play down his association with the great SF?
Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
>Derek mentioned that Clement had a grandfather, and Clement challenged
> For instance, when the subject was 'Clement Freud' many years ago,
>ago,
> --- In just-a-minute@..., Robert Torres
> <bobbyshaddoe3004@> wrote:
> >
> > For instance, when the subject was 'Clement Freud' many years
> Derek mentioned that Clement had a grandfather, and Clementchallenged
> in saying that he had two grandfathers, not one. and Nicholasmake
> disallowed the challenge because of some erroneous claim that if
> Clement has two grandfathers then he must have one, which doesn't
> sense. if you have two grandfathers, you have two grandfathers,one
> from each side of the family.this
>
> I disagree! If I have two apples I also have one apple - to prove
> I can eat one apple and still have one remaining.be
>
> Similarly, if you have a pile of 100 bricks, and I ask you if I can
> have one brick, a reply stating that you don't have one brick would
> erroneous.
>
> :)
>
> A.
>
>In the wider sense you raise a subject which fascinates me, the
> Having listened to most of the existing JAMs it occured to me that I
> could not recall a single instance in which the morose Mr Freud made
> explicit reference to his celebrated forebear (save for a round where
> he responded to a comment made by Derek Nimmo about Sigmund's beard,
> or lack of one).
>
> This surprises me as Clement has very definite form when it comes to
> discussing his children, wife, brother, etc on the show. Was he keen
> to play down his association with the great SF?
>
> In the show where Emma Freud appeared, she said Clement was once askedLol! Clement is so classy.
> by a journalist "can you tell me about your other grandfather?" And
> Clement replied "he was the father of psychology". That's a pretty
> good joke, and very Clementish.
--- In just-a-minute@ yahoogroups. com, Robert Torres
<bobbyshaddoe3004@ ...> wrote:
>
> For instance, when the subject was 'Clement Freud' many years ago,
Derek mentioned that Clement had a grandfather, and Clement challenged
in saying that he had two grandfathers, not one. and Nicholas
disallowed the challenge because of some erroneous claim that if
Clement has two grandfathers then he must have one, which doesn't make
sense. if you have two grandfathers, you have two grandfathers, one
from each side of the family.
I disagree! If I have two apples I also have one apple - to prove this
I can eat one apple and still have one remaining.
Similarly, if you have a pile of 100 bricks, and I ask you if I can
have one brick, a reply stating that you don't have one brick would be
erroneous.
:)
A.
Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
I agree. Any number greater than one also includes one; if a room
contains thirty chairs, it would also be factually correct to say
that there are five chairs.
--- In just-a-minute@ yahoogroups. com, "Alexis Birkill" <yahoo@...>
wrote:
>
> --- In just-a-minute@ yahoogroups. com, Robert Torres
> <bobbyshaddoe3004@ > wrote:
> >
> > For instance, when the subject was 'Clement Freud' many years
ago,
> Derek mentioned that Clement had a grandfather, and Clement
challenged
> in saying that he had two grandfathers, not one. and Nicholas
> disallowed the challenge because of some erroneous claim that if
> Clement has two grandfathers then he must have one, which doesn't
make
> sense. if you have two grandfathers, you have two grandfathers,
one
> from each side of the family.
>
> I disagree! If I have two apples I also have one apple - to prove
this
> I can eat one apple and still have one remaining.
>
> Similarly, if you have a pile of 100 bricks, and I ask you if I can
> have one brick, a reply stating that you don't have one brick would
be
> erroneous.
>
> :)
>
> A.
>
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.
That's a fascinating line of inquiry, Dean.
Paul's flourishing expositions seem brilliantly pulled from a place other than himself. On the recent HIGNFY episode with Russell Brand, I was in tears of laughter when Paul offered to hold the camera's attention with an extemporaneous story about buying a sweater while Russell peed in a bottle on stage. Talk about the best of both worlds. I certainly find it more easy to talk about my own experiences with school and family than to make up, on the spot, a story that probably never happened, but Paul riffs effortlessly while simultaneously keeping the game's restrictions in mind. I think we hear him do it so often that we forget that for most people, such a thing would be very difficult.
> In the show where Emma Freud appeared, she said Clement was once asked
> by a journalist "can you tell me about your other grandfather? " And
> Clement replied "he was the father of psychology". That's a pretty
> good joke, and very Clementish.
Lol! Clement is so classy.
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.
> That's a fascinating line of inquiry, Dean.He certainly is a genius at improvisation. Even Kenneth - who I think is
>
> Paul's flourishing expositions seem brilliantly pulled from a place
> other than himself. On the recent HIGNFY episode with Russell Brand, I
> was in tears of laughter when Paul offered to hold the camera's
> attention with an extemporaneous story about buying a sweater while
> Russell peed in a bottle on stage. Talk about the best of both worlds.
> I certainly find it more easy to talk about my own experiences with
> school and family than to make up, on the spot, a story that probably
> never happened, but Paul riffs effortlessly while simultaneously
> keeping the game's restrictions in mind. I think we hear him do it so
> often that we forget that for most people, such a thing would be very
> difficult.
I think we’d have all died after peeing ourselves with laughter! J
Ant
From:
just-a-minute@... [mailto:just-a-minute@...] On Behalf Of Dean Bedford
Sent: 09 January 2008 22:28
To: just-a-minute@...
Subject: Re: [just-a-minute] Re:
Clement Freud on his grandfather
On Tuesday, January 8, 2008, at 09:53 AM, Sarah Falk wrote:
That's a fascinating line of inquiry, Dean.
Paul's flourishing expositions seem brilliantly pulled from a place other than
himself. On the recent HIGNFY episode with Russell Brand, I was in tears of
laughter when Paul offered to hold the camera's attention with an
extemporaneous story about buying a sweater while Russell peed in a bottle on
stage. Talk about the best of both worlds. I certainly find it more easy to
talk about my own experiences with school and family than to make up, on the
spot, a story that probably never happened, but Paul riffs effortlessly while
simultaneously keeping the game's restrictions in mind. I think we hear him do
it so often that we forget that for most people, such a thing would be very
difficult.
He certainly is a genius at improvisation. Even Kenneth - who I think is still
slightly the better at JAM - wasn't as inventive as Paul. Kenneth often went
back to particular stories and routines, though he could also invent of course.
Paul so rarely repeats a joke or a story (apart from "repetition of
zoological gardens").
It's interesting though. I was transcribing the last show of the last season a
couple of days ago, the one with Graham Norton (that I saw! teehee), and I
thought he was very much at his best. He took on the sort of role that Kenneth
and Paul both played/play, coming in if it's starting to get dull with a silly
challenge and lifting the whole thing. Perhaps it's just me but I have a
feeling Graham's best performances are when Paul isn't on the show with him.
I get the feeling that while both would be crazy not to admire the other's
comedic skills, they are not exactly matey. I stand to be corrected but I think
it's true that Graham has never appeared on Paul's shows (HIGNFY, Room 101) and
that Paul has never appeared on Graham's various chat shows. Maybe they both
like to be the star turn?
Which of course makes me wonder how Kenneth and Paul would have gone on JAM
together... to think there was only one year between their appearances too! We
were so close to hearing them together...
I would (just about) die to hear a JAM with say Kenneth, Paul, Graham and
Stephen Fry/Ross Noble/Peter Jones on the panel... I think it would have been
fascinating to have heard Kenneth interacting with Paul or Graham.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 10 | 23 | 12 | 1 | 13 | 5 | 1 | 19 | 12 | 31 | 4 | 14 |
| 2018 | 4 | 7 | 21 | 8 | 9 | 37 | 9 | 5 | 19 | 25 | 5 | 14 |
| 2017 | 4 | 34 | 22 | 12 | 17 | 20 | 4 | 19 | 23 | 44 | 23 | 16 |
| 2016 | 13 | 49 | 39 | 57 | 60 | 87 | 10 | 32 | 24 | 12 | 9 | 23 |
| 2015 | 51 | 97 | 32 | 49 | 41 | 54 | 20 | 28 | 0 | 14 | 31 | 16 |
| 2014 | 9 | 75 | 68 | 33 | 28 | 33 | 52 | 82 | 51 | 32 | 38 | 79 |
| 2013 | 463 | 251 | 98 | 87 | 81 | 192 | 88 | 98 | 86 | 38 | 54 | 27 |
| 2012 | 92 | 121 | 180 | 199 | 125 | 88 | 71 | 155 | 118 | 166 | 125 | 144 |
| 2011 | 112 | 78 | 71 | 73 | 134 | 225 | 252 | 152 | 62 | 183 | 165 | 63 |
| 2010 | 142 | 117 | 153 | 94 | 69 | 49 | 69 | 183 | 82 | 71 | 68 | 75 |
| 2009 | 67 | 45 | 42 | 97 | 90 | 149 | 110 | 70 | 63 | 42 | 35 | 39 |
| 2008 | 200 | 120 | 175 | 120 | 70 | 109 | 87 | 115 | 71 | 45 | 58 | 38 |
| 2007 | 165 | 447 | 132 | 99 | 95 | 57 | 140 | 118 | 74 | 88 | 125 | 99 |
| FAQ | Contact | Services | Terms | Privacy | Credits |
[Page generated in 0.1086 seconds under 1.6% server load]
© 2012-2025 TVRDb.com. All rights reserved.