Listening today to an edition from 1973, prompted me to think that it’s been sometime since Nicholas Parsons has asked the audience to decide whom they would like to continue with the subject.
Does anybody know when the last time was?
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.9/1294 - Release Date: 22/02/2008 18:39
Actually it was last year, when Marcus Brigstocke challenged his tablemate Clement Freud on the subject of "Three of a Kind" in episode 670...
CLEMENT FREUD: A straight followed by a
full house would be other combinations of playing cards which you might well
confuse the enemy or the people with whom you are playing. Three of a kind
could also refer to a family, like triplets, one of which could be identical...
BUZZ
NICHOLAS PARSONS: So Marcus you challenged, and you're still trying to work
out...
MARCUS BRIGSTOCKE: Yeah, I'm write... I've written the whole thing down and I
think it's deviation because...
NP: I would have him for hesitation if I were you.
CF: Too late.
MB: No, deviation, how could only one of them be identical?
NP: One of them could be identical to one of the other two.
MB: No! No that... two of them would have to be identical.
NP: No.
MB: Those are the rules of being identical.
NP: There would be two identical ones, there would be two identical ones then
and one who wasn't identical.
MB: I'm sorry? There could be two identical ones and what?
NP: One, one who was not identical.
MB: Yes but...
NP: It's different.
MB: Yes I know it's different! But you can't, you can't call that third one
different just because they are. But Clement said one of them could be
identical, and at least two of them would have to be identical.
NP: Well if one of them was identical, then one of the other ones must look
exactly the same, which means they're two...
MB: Yes!
NP: ... and there's one...
MB: My point exactly!
NP: I know! And I disagree with it! Clement I think, I give you the benefit of
the doubt, you have a correct challenge yes...
MB: Even Clement can't believe it!
CF: I haven't...
NP: One of them is identical to one of the other two!
MB: Yes, which means, if they're identical, that one of the others must also be
identical! That's how identical works!
NP: No, I'm going to put this to the audience! If you agree with Marcus, will
you please cheer for him. And if you disagree with Marcus, will you all shout
for me. And will you all do it together now.
CHEERS AND BOOS FROM THE AUDIENCE
NP: Marcus I actually think the audience agree with you. So... I disagree with
the audience. But I'm always magnanimous in these situations and the audience
has spoken, the final arbiters. So Marcus you have the subject and 14 seconds
starting now…
This sort of thing only happens very rarely. The last time before that was in fact in 2002 J
Ant
From:
just-a-minute@...
[mailto: just-a-minute@... ]
On Behalf Of Steve Kenrick
Sent: 24 February 2008 18:28
To: just-a-minute@...
Subject: [just-a-minute] Putting
it to the audience
Listening today to an edition from 1973, prompted me to think that it’s been sometime since Nicholas Parsons has asked the audience to decide whom they would like to continue with the subject.
Does anybody know when the last time was?
No virus
found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.9/1294 - Release Date: 22/02/2008
18:39
Thanks for that Anthony, I must have missed that episode.
From:
just-a-minute@... [mailto:
just-a-minute@... ] On Behalf Of Anthony Hobson
Sent: 24 February 2008 18:54
To: just-a-minute@...
Subject: RE: [just-a-minute]
Putting it to the audience
Actually it was last year, when Marcus Brigstocke challenged his tablemate Clement Freud on the subject of "Three of a Kind" in episode 670...
CLEMENT FREUD: A straight followed by a full house would be other
combinations of playing cards which you might well confuse the enemy or the
people with whom you are playing. Three of a kind could also refer to a family,
like triplets, one of which could be identical...
BUZZ
NICHOLAS PARSONS: So Marcus you challenged, and you're still trying to work
out...
MARCUS BRIGSTOCKE: Yeah, I'm write... I've written the whole thing down and I
think it's deviation because...
NP: I would have him for hesitation if I were you.
CF: Too late.
MB: No, deviation, how could only one of them be identical?
NP: One of them could be identical to one of the other two.
MB: No! No that... two of them would have to be identical.
NP: No.
MB: Those are the rules of being identical.
NP: There would be two identical ones, there would be two identical ones then
and one who wasn't identical.
MB: I'm sorry? There could be two identical ones and what?
NP: One, one who was not identical.
MB: Yes but...
NP: It's different.
MB: Yes I know it's different! But you can't, you can't call that third one
different just because they are. But Clement said one of them could be
identical, and at least two of them would have to be identical.
NP: Well if one of them was identical, then one of the other ones must look
exactly the same, which means they're two...
MB: Yes!
NP: ... and there's one...
MB: My point exactly!
NP: I know! And I disagree with it! Clement I think, I give you the benefit of
the doubt, you have a correct challenge yes...
MB: Even Clement can't believe it!
CF: I haven't...
NP: One of them is identical to one of the other two!
MB: Yes, which means, if they're identical, that one of the others must also be
identical! That's how identical works!
NP: No, I'm going to put this to the audience! If you agree with Marcus, will
you please cheer for him. And if you disagree with Marcus, will you all shout
for me. And will you all do it together now.
CHEERS AND BOOS FROM THE AUDIENCE
NP: Marcus I actually think the audience agree with you. So... I disagree with
the audience. But I'm always magnanimous in these situations and the audience
has spoken, the final arbiters. So Marcus you have the subject and 14 seconds
starting now…
This sort of thing only happens very rarely. The last time before that was in fact in 2002 J
Ant
From: just-a-minute@ yahoogroups. com
[mailto: just-a-minute@ yahoogroups. com ]
On Behalf Of Steve Kenrick
Sent: 24 February 2008 18:28
To: just-a-minute@ yahoogroups. com
Subject: [just-a-minute] Putting
it to the audience
Listening today to an edition from 1973, prompted me to think that it’s been sometime since Nicholas Parsons has asked the audience to decide whom they would like to continue with the subject.
Does anybody know when the last time was?
No virus
found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.9/1294 - Release Date: 22/02/2008
18:39
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.9/1294 - Release Date: 22/02/2008 18:39
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.21.0/1296 - Release Date: 24/02/2008 12:19
Listening today to an edition from 1973, prompted me to think that itÂ’s been sometime since Nicholas Parsons has asked the audience to decide whom they would like to continue with the subject.Does anybody know when the last time was?No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.9/1294 - Release Date: 22/02/2008 18:39
Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
>tablemate
> Actually it was last year, when Marcus Brigstocke challenged his
> Clement Freud on the subject of "Three of a Kind" in episode 670...well done Anthony!
>670...
> --- In just-a-minute@..., "Anthony Hobson" <antster@>
> wrote:
> >
> > Actually it was last year, when Marcus Brigstocke challenged his
> tablemate
> > Clement Freud on the subject of "Three of a Kind" in episode
>up. I
> well done Anthony!
>
> I have a recollection at some point recently of Nicholas saying he
> didn't do this so much any more because he felt it slowed things
> think also that Paul doesn't like the audience interaction as muchas
> Kenneth did. Which seems strange given Paul's background in
> improvisation with ideas being thrown in from the audience.
>
> cheers, D
>
>with the newest episodes. nowadays it seems instead of putting
> honestly I don't know because I'm still trying to get caught up
>to think that it's been sometime since Nicholas Parsons has asked the
> Steve Kenrick <steve.kenrick@...> wrote:
> Listening today to an edition from 1973, prompted me
>22/02/2008 18:39
> Does anybody know when the last time was?
>
>
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.9/1294 - Release Date:
>Try it now.
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.
>
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 10 | 23 | 12 | 1 | 13 | 5 | 1 | 19 | 12 | 31 | 4 | 14 |
| 2018 | 4 | 7 | 21 | 8 | 9 | 37 | 9 | 5 | 19 | 25 | 5 | 14 |
| 2017 | 4 | 34 | 22 | 12 | 17 | 20 | 4 | 19 | 23 | 44 | 23 | 16 |
| 2016 | 13 | 49 | 39 | 57 | 60 | 87 | 10 | 32 | 24 | 12 | 9 | 23 |
| 2015 | 51 | 97 | 32 | 49 | 41 | 54 | 20 | 28 | 0 | 14 | 31 | 16 |
| 2014 | 9 | 75 | 68 | 33 | 28 | 33 | 52 | 82 | 51 | 32 | 38 | 79 |
| 2013 | 463 | 251 | 98 | 87 | 81 | 192 | 88 | 98 | 86 | 38 | 54 | 27 |
| 2012 | 92 | 121 | 180 | 199 | 125 | 88 | 71 | 155 | 118 | 166 | 125 | 144 |
| 2011 | 112 | 78 | 71 | 73 | 134 | 225 | 252 | 152 | 62 | 183 | 165 | 63 |
| 2010 | 142 | 117 | 153 | 94 | 69 | 49 | 69 | 183 | 82 | 71 | 68 | 75 |
| 2009 | 67 | 45 | 42 | 97 | 90 | 149 | 110 | 70 | 63 | 42 | 35 | 39 |
| 2008 | 200 | 120 | 175 | 120 | 70 | 109 | 87 | 115 | 71 | 45 | 58 | 38 |
| 2007 | 165 | 447 | 132 | 99 | 95 | 57 | 140 | 118 | 74 | 88 | 125 | 99 |
| FAQ | Contact | Services | Terms | Privacy | Credits |
[Page generated in 0.0845 seconds under 1.48% server load]
© 2012-2025 TVRDb.com. All rights reserved.