The Television & Radio Database

Home  
Members  
Join  
Search  
Listings  

Just A Minute

JAM Series | JAM Stats | JAM Today | JAM Group

Search the JAM Yahoo Group Archive:

 
<<<<   211   >>>>

Re: Remembering your first JAM

Messages in this topic: 16 View All
Robert TorresFeb 4, 2007
 
 
no, it's quite clear that logic has no place on this program, because I sure as heck haven't seen it.  i mean logic is thrown away for the sake of laughter and entertainment or for what Nicholas perceives to be entertainment or just for the sake of creating banter and humor or trying to elicite some sort of outraged reaction from the other panelists, and while I can see that obviously it does work in some cases, in other cases it doesn't because really it just makes nonsense out of things.  I mean granted yeah when he disagrees with someone it creates some really great moments, but Nicholas can be very very condescending, patronizing and pompous about it all, which is what really annoys me more than off the wall decision making that comes around.  and if you do listen carefully, there are several instances that whenever someone has a real go at Nicholas he usually says something along the lines of 'Oh I do give them good cues, don't I?' 
 
and might I just add that I what I mean was that Nicholas goes out of his way to pretty much imply that he is the source of the comedy generated on the show.  I know it came out the wrong way, and in regards to the Rocky Horror comment, back in the mid to late 90's during some of the shows you often heard it being mentioned that Nicholas was in the Rocky Horror Show, because there was a revival of the stage show going on at the time. 
 
and yes I do listen to the man, very closely, and there are several instances where he can't seem to speak properly, then again the same could be said about the other panelists as well.  and I never said that I could do better, nor do I believe that I could do better.  so now who's having delusions? 
 

Sarah Falk <minerva.moon@...> wrote:
After reading this, your other post, and having followed some of your
outraged comments on the blog, I realize it's clear that you have a
deep-seated problem that logic can't even hope to clear up. I won't,
then, waste as much energy as I might have in telling you how utterly
wrong you are.

It's hilarious to read your crudely-constructed sentences, strung
together by inappropriately placed commas, harping on about how
Nicholas can't put a coherent thought of his own together. Good God.
Is your prejudice keeping you from actually listening to the man? Have
you read his books? You claim that he goes on and on about such things
as how he's the main source of comedy, and that he won't stop
reminding us that he was in the Rocky Horror Show. A Google search
through Dean's transcripts will show definitively that neither is
true. The comedy comment is ludicrous, for he never says it. As for
Rocky Horror, the vast majority of the time, someone else (like Paul
or Gyles) always brought it up first, and Nicholas' comments about it
are very short--all he wants to do is keep the game going.

In comedy, Nicholas Parsons HAS had a lot of experience being the
"straight man", but I'm not going to sit here and quote his book at
you. Just because he's not perfect doesn't mean that he's not
brilliant. Saying that you'd be able to do better points firmly to
delusions of grandeur on your part.

--- In just-a-minute@ yahoogroups. com, Robert Torres
<bobbyshaddoe3004@ ...> wrote:
>
> Oh come on, the man was once outwitted by an herbacious border,
doesn't believe in extra wide fitting shoes, thinks that you can be
overcompensated by a huge duffel coat, gives someone a bonus point
just for saying 'bonus point', or how about this:
>
> Ross Noble was speaking on a subject, was surprised that he still
had it, Tim Rice challenges for deviation, Nicholas says that it
wasn't that it was hesitation, then gives the subject to Paul when
Paul wasn't the one who challenged.
>
> or how about on a more recent episode when Kit Hesketh Harvey was
talking about some subject or other and talks about being a young TV,
and it takes Nicholas TEN MINUTES to realize that TV stood for
transvestites even though the other panelists were saying it to him
throughout the whole argument and Nicholas was still wittering on
about TELEVISIONS that Kit was dressed as a television, and even AFTER
the realization he was STILL talking about televisions afterwards,
this coming from someone that wouldn't shut up about being in the
Rocky Horror Show.
>
>
> Sarah Falk <minerva.moon@ ...> wrote:
> Jesus Christ on a pedestal. Nicholas Parsons--inept as a
chairman?
>
> --- In just-a-minute@ yahoogroups. com, "bobbyshaddoe3004"
> <bobbyshaddoe3004@ > wrote:
>
> > I LOVE the episode that had to do with herbacious borders, I thought
> > that was so hilarious, cuz I was able to come up with more sarcastic
> > jokes about how you could be outwitted by an herbacious border.
> >
> > essentially I reference this episode every time I comment about
> > Nicholas' complete and utter ineptitude as chairman, only with
several
> > other examples as well.



Never Miss an Email
Stay connected with Yahoo! Mail on your mobile. Get started!


 
<<<<   211   >>>>

Back to the Top
 

Message History

 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
201910231211351191231414
201847218937951925514
20174342212172041923442316
201613493957608710322412923
201551973249415420280143116
201497568332833528251323879
2013463251988781192889886385427
2012921211801991258871155118166125144
20111127871731342252521526218316563
20101421171539469496918382716875
200967454297901491107063423539
2008200120175120701098711571455838
2007165447132999557140118748812599

|   FAQ   |   Contact   |   Services   |   Terms   |   Privacy   |   Credits   |

[Page generated in 0.0819 seconds under 1.87% server load]

© 2012-2025 TVRDb.com. All rights reserved.