> Well some of you have been busy downloading these past two weeks and I'm--
> curious.
>
> Do you guys feel you must listen to all your new shows right away?
> Anyone pigging out on new JAM - listening to a dozen a day or something?
> Or rationing it out so you have one new show a day?
>
> Anyone come across a special moment that made it all worthwhile? A guest
> you loved? A classic line or moment? A show you'd heard about but never
> heard - and it was just as good as you hoped?
>
> Do tell!
--- In just-a-minute@..., Dean Bedford <dbedford@...> wrote:
>
> Well some of you have been busy downloading these past two weeks and
I'm
> curious.
>
> Do you guys feel you must listen to all your new shows right away?
> Anyone pigging out on new JAM - listening to a dozen a day or
something?
> Or rationing it out so you have one new show a day?
>
> Anyone come across a special moment that made it all worthwhile? A
guest
> you loved? A classic line or moment? A show you'd heard about but
never
> heard - and it was just as good as you hoped?
>
> Do tell!
>
> I generally try to listen to one new episode a day. So far the episode Ithat is a classic JAM moment - and the whole ep is very funny
> like best of the ones that I got recently was the one where Kenneth
> throws a tantrum over losing the subject of stopping hickupps.
> I'm afraid it's been pigging out, as in "spending more time listening toThis also would have to go on a list ofg the all-time classic moments
> JAM than doing schoolwork," which isn't so good, you know. I'm working
> on it!
>
> I've been keeping a not-so-complete list of some of the exchanges I've
> particularly liked, which includes Nicholas's pronounciation of
> "eccentricity" (and Clement: "I wish I had "eccentricity"!"); Julian
> Clary remarking, regarding Derek Nimmo, "We're not getting on at all
> well!"; oh, and Kenneth Williams's and Tim Rice's jibe about an
> "all-male panel" . . .
>
> Bliss!
--- In just-a-minute@..., Dean Bedford <dbedford@...> wrote:
>
> This also would have to go on a list ofg the all-time classic moments
>
> KENNETH WILLIAMS: And one of the most remarkable things is that as
> lately as 1952 that he actually appeared at the Festival Hall. But
> whether it was at the Conservertwois, or whether it was the
> (unintelligible), you name it...
>
> BUZZ
>
> NICHOLAS PARSONS: Tim Rice has challenged.
>
> TIM RICE: Two whethers.
>
> NP: Two whethers?
>
> TR: Whether it was so-and-so, whether it was...
>
> KW: What does it matter, you great fool! I've come all the way from
> Great Portland Street! I'm not going to be made a fool of by that great
> jerk! He was also very rude to me before this show began! Very rude to
> me before this show began!
>
> NP: Was he?
>
> KW: Yes!
>
> NP: What did he say?
>
> KW: I said "it's an all male panel on tonight", and he looked at me and
> said "well, almost!"
>
> On Sunday, February 4, 2007, at 01:26 AM, Blackadder wrote:episode I
>
> > I generally try to listen to one new episode a day. So far the
> > like best of the ones that I got recently was the one whereKenneth
> > throws a tantrum over losing the subject of stopping hickupps.subject
>
> that is a classic JAM moment - and the whole ep is very funny
>
> NICHOLAS PARSONS: And Kenneth you also begin the next round. The
> is stopping hiccups. Can you tell us something about that in thisgame
> starting now.established
>
> KENNETH WILLIAMS: You must alter the rhythms that have been
> in the sarspiratory diaphragm. So consequently you must breathe ina
> different way. One of the best tips I can give you is to inhaledeeply
> and then recite a long piece. Such asand
> (very very fast to the point of being unintelligible) The old order
> changes yielding place to the new,
> and God fulfils Himself in many ways,
> lest one good custom corrupt the world.
> Our little systems have their day,
> they have their day then cease to be.
> They are but broken lights of Thee, and thou...
>
> BUZZ
>
> NP: Peter Jones has challenged.
>
> PETER JONES: You'd be better off with the hiccups!
>
> NP: So we give Peter Jones a bonus point for his delightful remark
> also another point for a correct challenge because he'd deviatedfrom
> hiccups on to a recitation of er a poem which we couldn'tunderstand!
> Peter you have 23 seconds on stopping hiccups starting now.what
>
> BUZZ
>
> NP: Yes Kenneth you challenged.
>
> KW: What is, how, how did the subject get taken away from me? What,
> is the grounds?something.
>
> NP: Because you deviated from hiccups, you were just reciting
>hiccups".
> KW: On the contrary, I was describing a remedy and he...
>
> NP: I know but your remedy went...
>
> KW: He didn't challenge. He said "you'd be better off with the
> He didn't express a challenge. He was just making a funny remarkand the
> audience, for some peculiar reason...the
>
> NP: Well I thought, I thought his...
>
> KW: ... found this very comic! I don't find it funny! I've come all
> way from Great Portland Street and I'm not here to be made fun of!Do
> you think I'm some object of ridicule? Do you think that's what Iam?
>
> AUDIENCE SHOUTS OF "YES"
>
> PJ: Yes! Yes!
>
> DEREK NIMMO: Can we put that to the audience?
>
> On Sunday, February 4, 2007, at 01:26 AM, Blackadder wrote:episode I
>
> > I generally try to listen to one new episode a day. So far the
> > like best of the ones that I got recently was the one whereKenneth
> > throws a tantrum over losing the subject of stopping hickupps.subject
>
> that is a classic JAM moment - and the whole ep is very funny
>
> NICHOLAS PARSONS: And Kenneth you also begin the next round. The
> is stopping hiccups. Can you tell us something about that in thisgame
> starting now.established
>
> KENNETH WILLIAMS: You must alter the rhythms that have been
> in the sarspiratory diaphragm. So consequently you must breathe ina
> different way. One of the best tips I can give you is to inhaledeeply
> and then recite a long piece. Such asand
> (very very fast to the point of being unintelligible) The old order
> changes yielding place to the new,
> and God fulfils Himself in many ways,
> lest one good custom corrupt the world.
> Our little systems have their day,
> they have their day then cease to be.
> They are but broken lights of Thee, and thou...
>
> BUZZ
>
> NP: Peter Jones has challenged.
>
> PETER JONES: You'd be better off with the hiccups!
>
> NP: So we give Peter Jones a bonus point for his delightful remark
> also another point for a correct challenge because he'd deviatedfrom
> hiccups on to a recitation of er a poem which we couldn'tunderstand!
> Peter you have 23 seconds on stopping hiccups starting now.what
>
> BUZZ
>
> NP: Yes Kenneth you challenged.
>
> KW: What is, how, how did the subject get taken away from me? What,
> is the grounds?something.
>
> NP: Because you deviated from hiccups, you were just reciting
>hiccups".
> KW: On the contrary, I was describing a remedy and he...
>
> NP: I know but your remedy went...
>
> KW: He didn't challenge. He said "you'd be better off with the
> He didn't express a challenge. He was just making a funny remarkand the
> audience, for some peculiar reason...the
>
> NP: Well I thought, I thought his...
>
> KW: ... found this very comic! I don't find it funny! I've come all
> way from Great Portland Street and I'm not here to be made fun of!Do
> you think I'm some object of ridicule? Do you think that's what Iam?
>
> AUDIENCE SHOUTS OF "YES"
>
> PJ: Yes! Yes!
>
> DEREK NIMMO: Can we put that to the audience?
>
>
> I remember this one in particular, Peter Jones always had the great
> one-liner, and I loved Kenneth's tantrums, its something that no one
> does nowadays, no one really haggles over things, well they kinda do,
> but for the most part they're too apologetic and too willing to
> kowtow to Nicholas even though he's clearly wrong. but now, being
> wrong or right is hardly a factor in this game considering that in
> spite of Nicholas' claims, logic plays no role in this show.
>
> I remember this one in particular, Peter Jones always had the greatBobby - Two posts on different threads in 10 minutes from registering,
> one-liner, and I loved Kenneth's tantrums, its something that no one
> does nowadays, no one really haggles over things, well they kinda do,
> but for the most part they're too apologetic and too willing to
> kowtow to Nicholas even though he's clearly wrong. but now, being
> wrong or right is hardly a factor in this game considering that in
> spite of Nicholas' claims, logic plays no role in this show.
> When I download a whole lot of eps, I tend to listen to them all in ahehe that's me too! I think "oh just one more..." How many do you listen
> row, and then wish I hadn't coz i don't have any new eps to listen to
> later :( I should learn to spread them out more. It's just so
> addictive though!
The panellists don't concede to Nicholas because they're too
apologetic or frightened; they do it because there's really nothing to
fight about. Nicholas does a fantastic job of keeping things even in
the game. The rules are set, but they can be bent easily, and just
because he interprets them in one way for one particular circumstance
doesn't mean that he has to do the same thing all the time. That's
part of the game. Logic plays a great role in it, but so does banter
and mishap. JAM might as well be Whose Line is it Anyway for how
little they care about the points, because really, that's not what's
important.
--- In just-a-minute@ yahoogroups. com, "bobbyshaddoe3004"
<bobbyshaddoe3004@ ...> wrote:
>
> I remember this one in particular, Peter Jones always had the great
> one-liner, and I loved Kenneth's tantrums, its something that no one
> does nowadays, no one really haggles over things, well they kinda do,
> but for the most part they're too apologetic and too willing to
> kowtow to Nicholas even though he's clearly wrong. but now, being
> wrong or right is hardly a factor in this game considering that in
> spite of Nicholas' claims, logic plays no role in this show.
>
Check out the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster.
On Sunday, February 4, 2007, at 06:21 PM, humiliated_grapes2 wrote:
> When I download a whole lot of eps, I tend to listen to them all in a
> row, and then wish I hadn't coz i don't have any new eps to listen to
> later :( I should learn to spread them out more. It's just so
> addictive though!
hehe that's me too! I think "oh just one more..." How many do you listen
to in a row. I think my record for most new JAM shows in a row is 12....
Anyone would think I didn't have a life... :-(
The fish are biting.
Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing.
> hehe that's me too! I think "oh just one more..." How many do youlisten
> to in a row. I think my record for most new JAM shows in a row is12....
>Yeah, I worked out the other day that I'd spent 6 hrs listening to
> Anyone would think I didn't have a life... :-(
> --- In just-a-minute@..., Dean Bedford <dbedford@...>give us an example of one you could recite aloud parts of... :-)
> wrote:
> > hehe that's me too! I think "oh just one more..." How many do you
> listen
> > to in a row. I think my record for most new JAM shows in a row is
> 12....
> >
> > Anyone would think I didn't have a life... :-(
>
> Yeah, I worked out the other day that I'd spent 6 hrs listening to
> JAM, so that's 12 episodes. That must be my record too. I don't just
> listen to new ones though, I often listen to the same ones I've heard
> about 50 times, and can now sort of mouth along to some of them. How
> sad is that?
>
--- In just-a-minute@..., Dean Bedford <dbedford@...> wrote:
>
>
> On Monday, February 5, 2007, at 07:55 PM, humiliated_grapes2 wrote:
>
> > --- In just-a-minute@..., Dean Bedford <dbedford@>
> > wrote:
> > > hehe that's me too! I think "oh just one more..." How many do you
> > listen
> > > to in a row. I think my record for most new JAM shows in a row is
> > 12....
> > >
> > > Anyone would think I didn't have a life... :-(
> >
> > Yeah, I worked out the other day that I'd spent 6 hrs listening to
> > JAM, so that's 12 episodes. That must be my record too. I don't just
> > listen to new ones though, I often listen to the same ones I've heard
> > about 50 times, and can now sort of mouth along to some of them. How
> > sad is that?
> >
>
> give us an example of one you could recite aloud parts of... :-)
>
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 10 | 23 | 12 | 1 | 13 | 5 | 1 | 19 | 12 | 31 | 4 | 14 |
| 2018 | 4 | 7 | 21 | 8 | 9 | 37 | 9 | 5 | 19 | 25 | 5 | 14 |
| 2017 | 4 | 34 | 22 | 12 | 17 | 20 | 4 | 19 | 23 | 44 | 23 | 16 |
| 2016 | 13 | 49 | 39 | 57 | 60 | 87 | 10 | 32 | 24 | 12 | 9 | 23 |
| 2015 | 51 | 97 | 32 | 49 | 41 | 54 | 20 | 28 | 0 | 14 | 31 | 16 |
| 2014 | 9 | 75 | 68 | 33 | 28 | 33 | 52 | 82 | 51 | 32 | 38 | 79 |
| 2013 | 463 | 251 | 98 | 87 | 81 | 192 | 88 | 98 | 86 | 38 | 54 | 27 |
| 2012 | 92 | 121 | 180 | 199 | 125 | 88 | 71 | 155 | 118 | 166 | 125 | 144 |
| 2011 | 112 | 78 | 71 | 73 | 134 | 225 | 252 | 152 | 62 | 183 | 165 | 63 |
| 2010 | 142 | 117 | 153 | 94 | 69 | 49 | 69 | 183 | 82 | 71 | 68 | 75 |
| 2009 | 67 | 45 | 42 | 97 | 90 | 149 | 110 | 70 | 63 | 42 | 35 | 39 |
| 2008 | 200 | 120 | 175 | 120 | 70 | 109 | 87 | 115 | 71 | 45 | 58 | 38 |
| 2007 | 165 | 447 | 132 | 99 | 95 | 57 | 140 | 118 | 74 | 88 | 125 | 99 |
| FAQ | Contact | Services | Terms | Privacy | Credits |
[Page generated in 0.0763 seconds under 1.59% server load]
© 2012-2025 TVRDb.com. All rights reserved.