>seemed
> I remember in last year's BBC "Time Shift" documentary about TV
> remakes of radio shows that a TV pilot of ISIHAC was made. This
> ridiculous to me at first, given that the nature of the show meansintrigued
> that most of it could only really work on radio, and I was
> at the idea.other
>
> Does anyone know more about it? Google tells me that it was made by
> Granada and shelved because they wanted a younger line-up, but
> than that, I can't find much. Does anyone know what year was itmade in
> recorded? Presumably Willie Rushton was also present if it was
> the early 90s.this is taken from the bbc 30th anniversary of clue site :
--- In just-a-minute@..., "linda" <irishmanufan@...> wrote:
>
> --- In just-a-minute@..., "thomaswake16"
> <thomaswake16@> wrote:
> >
> > I remember in last year's BBC "Time Shift" documentary about TV
> > remakes of radio shows that a TV pilot of ISIHAC was made. This
> seemed
> > ridiculous to me at first, given that the nature of the show means
> > that most of it could only really work on radio, and I was
> intrigued
> > at the idea.
> >
> > Does anyone know more about it? Google tells me that it was made by
> > Granada and shelved because they wanted a younger line-up, but
> other
> > than that, I can't find much. Does anyone know what year was it
> > recorded? Presumably Willie Rushton was also present if it was
> made in
> > the early 90s.
>
>
> this is taken from the bbc 30th anniversary of clue site :
> There was going to be a TV version of Clue but you were deemed too
> old for television.
>
> "Tim: Well, we did a pilot. BBC weren't interested, naturally. So we
> did a pilot for ITV and everybody seemed to like it. We didn't get
> it quite right but it was going in the right direction. It went to
> the central area where they decide what to put on and they
> said, "Yes, great programme but could we have some younger people in
> it?"
> Barry: Can I apologise for hogging this?
> Graeme: Yes, of course you can.
> Barry: I apologise for hogging this.
> Graeme: At the back of all our minds was the worry that it is such a
> radio programme. It really exists on radio and works on radio and is
> about radio and putting it on television might somehow take away
> from its myth, might somehow spoil the radio show. We were never
> 100% about it.
> Tim: I was 100% about it as long as you kept going on on radio at
> the same time. That was pure greed though!
> Barry: Willie was ambivalent as I remember, sort of bolt fast at one
> point.
> Tim: I would actually quite like to have done it in a way because
> then we could have done some visual jokes which you can't do on
> radio. So there would have been an extra element and we started to
> try and put those on the pilot, didn't we? And not many of them
> worked because they technically wouldn't work"
>
> if you think that the show would only work on radio what was your
> reaction to the thought of the live shows . it worked fine on stage
> so i can imagine it would have worked well on tv .
> cheers
> Linda
>
>
> Fair point. It just seems to me that most of the audio-only gags (e.g.
> Samantha) are running jokes that the live audience would have
> understood. I can't imagine it would have played as well with a TV
> audience, which would presumably include a reasonable number of people
> who had never listened to the radio show.
>
> Of course, the same was true of the radio series when it first
> started. I suppose it's like the JAM TV series - it seems to me that
> there's something fundamental about it that just wouldn't feel "right"
> on TV, but I can't really put my finger on what it is.
>
> --- In just-a-minute@..., "linda" <irishmanufan@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In just-a-minute@..., "thomaswake16"
> > <thomaswake16@> wrote:
> > >
> > > I remember in last year's BBC "Time Shift" documentary about TV
> > > remakes of radio shows that a TV pilot of ISIHAC was made. This
> > seemed
> > > ridiculous to me at first, given that the nature of the show means
> > > that most of it could only really work on radio, and I was
> > intrigued
> > > at the idea.
> > >
> > > Does anyone know more about it? Google tells me that it was made by
> > > Granada and shelved because they wanted a younger line-up, but
> > other
> > > than that, I can't find much. Does anyone know what year was it
> > > recorded? Presumably Willie Rushton was also present if it was
> > made in
> > > the early 90s.
> >
> >
> > this is taken from the bbc 30th anniversary of clue site :
> > There was going to be a TV version of Clue but you were deemed too
> > old for television.
> >
> > "Tim: Well, we did a pilot. BBC weren't interested, naturally. So we
> > did a pilot for ITV and everybody seemed to like it. We didn't get
> > it quite right but it was going in the right direction. It went to
> > the central area where they decide what to put on and they
> > said, "Yes, great programme but could we have some younger people in
> > it?"
> > Barry: Can I apologise for hogging this?
> > Graeme: Yes, of course you can.
> > Barry: I apologise for hogging this.
> > Graeme: At the back of all our minds was the worry that it is such a
> > radio programme. It really exists on radio and works on radio and is
> > about radio and putting it on television might somehow take away
> > from its myth, might somehow spoil the radio show. We were never
> > 100% about it.
> > Tim: I was 100% about it as long as you kept going on on radio at
> > the same time. That was pure greed though!
> > Barry: Willie was ambivalent as I remember, sort of bolt fast at one
> > point.
> > Tim: I would actually quite like to have done it in a way because
> > then we could have done some visual jokes which you can't do on
> > radio. So there would have been an extra element and we started to
> > try and put those on the pilot, didn't we? And not many of them
> > worked because they technically wouldn't work"
> >
> > if you think that the show would only work on radio what was your
> > reaction to the thought of the live shows . it worked fine on stage
> > so i can imagine it would have worked well on tv .
> > cheers
> > Linda
> >
>
>(e.g.
> I don't suppose anyone knows what year it was made? The closest I've
> been able to find is "early 90s".
>
> --- In just-a-minute@..., "thomaswake16"
> <thomaswake16@> wrote:
> >
> > Fair point. It just seems to me that most of the audio-only gags
> > Samantha) are running jokes that the live audience would havepeople
> > understood. I can't imagine it would have played as well with a TV
> > audience, which would presumably include a reasonable number of
> > who had never listened to the radio show.that
> >
> > Of course, the same was true of the radio series when it first
> > started. I suppose it's like the JAM TV series - it seems to me
> > there's something fundamental about it that just wouldn'tfeel "right"
> > on TV, but I can't really put my finger on what it is.wrote:
> >
> > --- In just-a-minute@..., "linda" <irishmanufan@>
> > >TV
> > > --- In just-a-minute@..., "thomaswake16"
> > > <thomaswake16@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I remember in last year's BBC "Time Shift" documentary about
> > > > remakes of radio shows that a TV pilot of ISIHAC was made.This
> > > seemedmeans
> > > > ridiculous to me at first, given that the nature of the show
> > > > that most of it could only really work on radio, and I wasmade by
> > > intrigued
> > > > at the idea.
> > > >
> > > > Does anyone know more about it? Google tells me that it was
> > > > Granada and shelved because they wanted a younger line-up,but
> > > otherit
> > > > than that, I can't find much. Does anyone know what year was
> > > > recorded? Presumably Willie Rushton was also present if itwas
> > > made intoo
> > > > the early 90s.
> > >
> > >
> > > this is taken from the bbc 30th anniversary of clue site :
> > > There was going to be a TV version of Clue but you were deemed
> > > old for television.So we
> > >
> > > "Tim: Well, we did a pilot. BBC weren't interested, naturally.
> > > did a pilot for ITV and everybody seemed to like it. We didn'tget
> > > it quite right but it was going in the right direction. It wentto
> > > the central area where they decide what to put on and theypeople in
> > > said, "Yes, great programme but could we have some younger
> > > it?"such a
> > > Barry: Can I apologise for hogging this?
> > > Graeme: Yes, of course you can.
> > > Barry: I apologise for hogging this.
> > > Graeme: At the back of all our minds was the worry that it is
> > > radio programme. It really exists on radio and works on radioand is
> > > about radio and putting it on television might somehow takeaway
> > > from its myth, might somehow spoil the radio show. We werenever
> > > 100% about it.at
> > > Tim: I was 100% about it as long as you kept going on on radio
> > > the same time. That was pure greed though!at one
> > > Barry: Willie was ambivalent as I remember, sort of bolt fast
> > > point.because
> > > Tim: I would actually quite like to have done it in a way
> > > then we could have done some visual jokes which you can't do onto
> > > radio. So there would have been an extra element and we started
> > > try and put those on the pilot, didn't we? And not many of themyour
> > > worked because they technically wouldn't work"
> > >
> > > if you think that the show would only work on radio what was
> > > reaction to the thought of the live shows . it worked fine onstage
> > > so i can imagine it would have worked well on tv .
> > > cheers
> > > Linda
> > >
> >
>
> Fair point. It just seems to me that most of the audio-only gags (e.g.I think it's just static - nothing happening visually. Word games don't
> Samantha) are running jokes that the live audience would have
> understood. I can't imagine it would have played as well with a TV
> audience, which would presumably include a reasonable number of people
> who had never listened to the radio show.
>
> Of course, the same was true of the radio series when it first
> started. I suppose it's like the JAM TV series - it seems to me that
> there's something fundamental about it that just wouldn't feel "right"
> on TV, but I can't really put my finger on what it is.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 10 | 23 | 12 | 1 | 13 | 5 | 1 | 19 | 12 | 31 | 4 | 14 |
| 2018 | 4 | 7 | 21 | 8 | 9 | 37 | 9 | 5 | 19 | 25 | 5 | 14 |
| 2017 | 4 | 34 | 22 | 12 | 17 | 20 | 4 | 19 | 23 | 44 | 23 | 16 |
| 2016 | 13 | 49 | 39 | 57 | 60 | 87 | 10 | 32 | 24 | 12 | 9 | 23 |
| 2015 | 51 | 97 | 32 | 49 | 41 | 54 | 20 | 28 | 0 | 14 | 31 | 16 |
| 2014 | 9 | 75 | 68 | 33 | 28 | 33 | 52 | 82 | 51 | 32 | 38 | 79 |
| 2013 | 463 | 251 | 98 | 87 | 81 | 192 | 88 | 98 | 86 | 38 | 54 | 27 |
| 2012 | 92 | 121 | 180 | 199 | 125 | 88 | 71 | 155 | 118 | 166 | 125 | 144 |
| 2011 | 112 | 78 | 71 | 73 | 134 | 225 | 252 | 152 | 62 | 183 | 165 | 63 |
| 2010 | 142 | 117 | 153 | 94 | 69 | 49 | 69 | 183 | 82 | 71 | 68 | 75 |
| 2009 | 67 | 45 | 42 | 97 | 90 | 149 | 110 | 70 | 63 | 42 | 35 | 39 |
| 2008 | 200 | 120 | 175 | 120 | 70 | 109 | 87 | 115 | 71 | 45 | 58 | 38 |
| 2007 | 165 | 447 | 132 | 99 | 95 | 57 | 140 | 118 | 74 | 88 | 125 | 99 |
| FAQ | Contact | Services | Terms | Privacy | Credits |
[Page generated in 0.0774 seconds under 1.53% server load]
© 2012-2025 TVRDb.com. All rights reserved.