Home  

Members  

Join  

Search  

Listings  

 
<<<<   2946   >>>>

Topic: New Rule Suggestion

Message 1 / 3
Sabrina StuffFeb 25, 2009
 

 
Hi all.

Panelists currently get a bonus point for speaking for a full 60
seconds without any challenge. But if there is a challenge that is
humorous or disallowed, and they continue to speak, the speaker loses
the chance of their bonus point.

I reckon the rule should be changed to "A speaker gets a bonus point
if they speak for 60 seconds without a VALID interruption."

Groundbreaking stuff, I know. I hope those weak-of-heart amongst you
can stand the strain. :-)

Oh - and it's great to hear Clement back being sharp - his usual
Clementine self. He was sounding worryingly woolly and slow last year.

Cheers
Nylon

 
<<<<   2949   >>>>

Topic: Re: New Rule Suggestion

Message 2 / 3
Dean BedfordFeb 25, 2009
 

 
It's funny, I've often thought that this is unfair too - that you could
got for 60 minutes but are challenged wrongly and therefore miss out on
the bonus.

(clutches heart and slumps to the floor)

On Thursday, February 26, 2009, at 12:01 AM, Sabrina Stuff wrote:

> Hi all.
>
> Panelists currently get a bonus point for speaking for a full 60
> seconds without any challenge. But if there is a challenge that is
> humorous or disallowed, and they continue to speak, the speaker loses
> the chance of their bonus point.
>
> I reckon the rule should be changed to "A speaker gets a bonus point
> if they speak for 60 seconds without a VALID interruption."
>
> Groundbreaking stuff, I know. I hope those weak-of-heart amongst you
> can stand the strain. :-)
>
> Oh - and it's great to hear Clement back being sharp - his usual
> Clementine self. He was sounding worryingly woolly and slow last year.
>
> Cheers
> Nylon
>
>

 
<<<<   2951   >>>>

Topic: Re: New Rule Suggestion

Message 3 / 3
nylon netFeb 25, 2009
 

 
'Sixty minutes'?! That would indeed be noteworthy :-)

nylon.net
nylon@...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dbedford@...
> Sent: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:46:15 +1300
> To: just-a-minute@...
> Subject: Re: [just-a-minute] New Rule Suggestion
>
> It's funny, I've often thought that this is unfair too - that you could
> got for 60 minutes but are challenged wrongly and therefore miss out on
> the bonus.
>
> (clutches heart and slumps to the floor)
>
>
> On Thursday, February 26, 2009, at 12:01 AM, Sabrina Stuff wrote:
>
>> Hi all.
>>
>> Panelists currently get a bonus point for speaking for a full 60
>> seconds without any challenge. But if there is a challenge that is
>> humorous or disallowed, and they continue to speak, the speaker loses
>> the chance of their bonus point.
>>
>> I reckon the rule should be changed to "A speaker gets a bonus point
>> if they speak for 60 seconds without a VALID interruption."
>>
>> Groundbreaking stuff, I know. I hope those weak-of-heart amongst you
>> can stand the strain. :-)
>>
>> Oh - and it's great to hear Clement back being sharp - his usual
>> Clementine self. He was sounding worryingly woolly and slow last year.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Nylon
>>
>>

____________________________________________________________
Receive Notifications of Incoming Messages
Easily monitor multiple email accounts & access them with a click.
Visit http://www.inbox.com/notifier and check it out!