Just A Minute

Are they just missing in the sense that nobody has them, or were they
actually wiped by the BBC like a lot of other shows from that period?

---

Now that's room service! Choose from over 150,000 hotels
in 45,000 destinations on Yahoo! Travel to find your fit.

In the later episodes, I'm assuming it's just that no one has them.
Dean has certainly transcribed a lot of the "missing" ones (if I'm not
mistaken). AU Radio National is broadcasting them sequentially, so in
a couple of months, they'll get to an area where everyone has gaps.

---

Access over 1 million songs - Yahoo! Music Unlimited.

>
> In the later episodes, I'm assuming it's just that no one has them.
> Dean has certainly transcribed a lot of the "missing" ones (if I'm not
> mistaken). AU Radio National is broadcasting them sequentially, so in
> a couple of months, they'll get to an area where everyone has gaps.
>

--- In just-a-minute@..., "Dave" <j_a_m_fan@...> wrote:
>
> Any information on these AU Radio National broadcasts ? ie. do they
> have them on the web so that we can all pick them up? Also, where is
> this spreadsheet with a list of files? I may well have contributions to
> make, but can't find it searching the areas on the left.
>
> --- In just-a-minute@..., "Sarah Falk" <minerva.moon@>
> wrote:
> >
> > In the later episodes, I'm assuming it's just that no one has them.
> > Dean has certainly transcribed a lot of the "missing" ones (if I'm not
> > mistaken). AU Radio National is broadcasting them sequentially, so in
> > a couple of months, they'll get to an area where everyone has gaps.
> >
>

>
> Martin listens to and records Australia's ABC Radio National:
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/just-a-minute/message/72
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/just-a-minute/message/72>
>
> If you go to the website, you can "Listen Live" at 5:30 am Mondays
> (their time), which is conveniently 1:30 pm Sundays, my time. I'm

> -5:00 if that helps with converting time zones.
>
> And the "spreadsheet" is the list I'm trying to compile of who owns

> episode, for the purpose of getting them all here (eventually!):

> Episode List
> <http://wwww.freewebs.com/qitranscripts/justaminutelist.htm> .
>
> --- In just-a-minute@..., "Dave" <j_a_m_fan@> wrote:
> >
> > Any information on these AU Radio National broadcasts ? ie. do

> > have them on the web so that we can all pick them up? Also, where

> > this spreadsheet with a list of files? I may well have

> to
> > make, but can't find it searching the areas on the left.
> >
> > --- In just-a-minute@..., "Sarah Falk" <minerva.moon@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > In the later episodes, I'm assuming it's just that no one has

> > > Dean has certainly transcribed a lot of the "missing" ones (if

> not
> > > mistaken). AU Radio National is broadcasting them sequentially,

> in
> > > a couple of months, they'll get to an area where everyone has

> > >
> >
>

> Are they just missing in the sense that nobody has them, or were they
> actually wiped by the BBC like a lot of other shows from that period?

>
> This is extremely interesting news, not just for the chance to fill
> in odd gaps in the episode list, but there are a lot of poor quality
> recordings I'd love to get a chance to replace.
>
> I wonder if there are any other broadcasters out there doing anything
> similar. Thwe first lot of episodes I ever found were from a Canadian
> and I know they have a high quality public radio system. Do we have
> any Canadians in the group or anyone who knows of other broadcasters
> where missing/poor quality episodes can be re-recorded from?
>
> How can I help you compile your spreadsheet. In discussions with
> another member I was suggesting listing the MISSING episodes as the
> easiest way of going about swapping lists.
> (In fact so easy I just counted them and have a total of 59 missing,
> but this doesn't include the poor recordings/truncated episodes -
> also sad experience has shown me that not all episodes are what they
> purport to be once you start listening - however, if this sounds like
> I may have a useful collection to bring to your project then just say
> the word.)

> I wonder if there are any other broadcasters out there doing anything
> similar. Thwe first lot of episodes I ever found were from a Canadian
> and I know they have a high quality public radio system. Do we have
> any Canadians in the group or anyone who knows of other broadcasters
> where missing/poor quality episodes can be re-recorded from?

On Wednesday, February 7, 2007, at 01:07 AM, thomaswake16 wrote:

> Are they just missing in the sense that nobody has them, or were they
> actually wiped by the BBC like a lot of other shows from that period?

If you're looking at the spreadsheet, just missing in the sense that
no-one on that list has them.

I rather think there are a few from the first couple of years that may
have been wiped. But this would be only half a dozen shows or so.

I'm now missing only 14 radio shows, most from the first year or two -
and four of the 1995 TV series. I expect some of these will turn up some
day. It took me seven years after all to collect 691 shows. And it would
take me two weeks non-stop to listen to all those so no reason to be
greedy!

One day someone will write and say "I notice you haven't got all the
1995 series - would you like to see mine?" If that seems foolishly
optimistic, well, that's how I got the ones I have!

Dean

---

8:00? 8:25? 8:40? Find a flick in no time
with theYahoo! Search movie showtime shortcut.

> holy cow, you got four from the '95 series? 

On Wednesday, February 7, 2007, at 04:45 PM, Robert Torres wrote:

> holy cow, you got four from the '95 series? 

I have 10 from 1995 and all of 1994

---

Looking for earth-friendly autos?
Browse Top Cars by "Green Rating" at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center.

> cool, is it possible for you to post them or upload them or something? 

On Wednesday, February 7, 2007, at 06:14 PM, Robert Torres wrote:

> cool, is it possible for you to post them or upload them or something? 

have a look back through the messages, you'll see my comments on this....

---

It's here! Your new message!
Get new email alerts with the free Yahoo! Toolbar.

On Thursday, February 8, 2007, at 02:09 AM, Robert Torres wrote:

> I don't think I'll bother, given the terseness of this answer, it's
> obvious the idea of sharing it with the rest of us doesn't really
> appeal to you. 
>
> Dean Bedford <dbedford@...> wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday, February 7, 2007, at 06:14 PM, Robert Torres wrote:
>
> > cool, is it possible for you to post them or upload them or
> something? 
>
> have a look back through the messages, you'll see my comments on
> this....
>
>
>
>

>
> It's here! Your new message!
> Get new email alerts with the free Yahoo! Toolbar.
>

Firstly you're completely and utterly wrong in your assumption.
Secondly, this is a very rude response.

It's standard netiquette that you don't have to continually respond to
the same question every time someone new arrives.

Bobby, the only rule here is to be friendly and respectful of others.
Try and bear it in mind.




On Thursday, February 8, 2007, at 02:09 AM, Robert Torres wrote:

> I don't think I'll bother, given the terseness of this answer, it's
> obvious the idea of sharing it with the rest of us doesn't really
> appeal to you. 
>
> Dean Bedford wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday, February 7, 2007, at 06:14 PM, Robert Torres wrote:
>
> > cool, is it possible for you to post them or upload them or
> something? 
>
> have a look back through the messages, you'll see my comments on
> this....
>
>
>
>

>
> It's here! Your new message!
> Get new email alerts with the free Yahoo! Toolbar.
>

---

Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection.
Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta.

>
> i wasn't trying to be rude, just trying to extricate myself from

>
>
>
> Dean Bedford <dbedford@...> wrote:
> Firstly you're completely and utterly wrong in your assumption.
> Secondly, this is a very rude response.
>
> It's standard netiquette that you don't have to continually respond to
> the same question every time someone new arrives.
>
> Bobby, the only rule here is to be friendly and respectful of others.
> Try and bear it in mind.
>
>
>
>
> On Thursday, February 8, 2007, at 02:09 AM, Robert Torres wrote:
>
> > I don't think I'll bother, given the terseness of this answer, it's
> > obvious the idea of sharing it with the rest of us doesn't really
> > appeal to you.
> >
> > Dean Bedford wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wednesday, February 7, 2007, at 06:14 PM, Robert Torres wrote:
> >
> > > cool, is it possible for you to post them or upload them or
> > something?
> >
> > have a look back through the messages, you'll see my comments on
> > this....
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> >
> > It's here! Your new message!
> > Get new email alerts with the free Yahoo! Toolbar.
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection.
> Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta.
>

I assume that you've corresponded with Dean before, and as such, you
should know that he's not the type to be rude outright. He had been
asked before and gave a very good reason as to why his sharing
episodes was implausible at this point. Instead of saying "I don't
think I'll bother," why not *bother*, and figure out what you're
talking about instead of making assumptions that he was blowing you off?

--- In just-a-minute@ yahoogroups. com, Robert Torres
<bobbyshaddoe3004@ ...> wrote:
>
> i wasn't trying to be rude, just trying to extricate myself from
what I naturally assumed was a delicate issue. I mean I had just
recently joined this message group, so trying to go back to read
whatever it was you wrote regarding this particular issue must've
implied that you had already been asked several times about this issue
and gave the same response, I merely didn't want to get chewed out the
way I am now.
>
>
>
> Dean Bedford <dbedford@.. .> wrote:
> Firstly you're completely and utterly wrong in your assumption.
> Secondly, this is a very rude response.
>
> It's standard netiquette that you don't have to continually respond to
> the same question every time someone new arrives.
>
> Bobby, the only rule here is to be friendly and respectful of others.
> Try and bear it in mind.
>
>
>
>
> On Thursday, February 8, 2007, at 02:09 AM, Robert Torres wrote:
>
> > I don't think I'll bother, given the terseness of this answer, it's
> > obvious the idea of sharing it with the rest of us doesn't really
> > appeal to you.
> >
> > Dean Bedford wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wednesday, February 7, 2007, at 06:14 PM, Robert Torres wrote:
> >
> > > cool, is it possible for you to post them or upload them or
> > something?
> >
> > have a look back through the messages, you'll see my comments on
> > this....
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> >
> > It's here! Your new message!
> > Get new email alerts with the free Yahoo! Toolbar.
> >
>
>
>
> ------------ --------- --------- ---
> Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection.
> Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta.
>

---

Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.