The Television & Radio Database

Home  
Members  
Join  
Search  
Listings  

Just A Minute

JAM Series | JAM Stats | JAM Today | JAM Group

Search the JAM Yahoo Group Archive:

 
<<<<   3206   >>>>

Re: What Info Do You Want In JAM Labels?

Messages in this topic: 16 View All
Dean BedfordJun 7, 2009
 
 
I only speak for myself of course but now that there is a eppy numbering
system with general acceptance I reckon the first subject thing is not
of much use. It used to be a way to identify subjects but its now
unnecessary if the eppy number is there. It would be more useful to me
to have the panel identified as I look through the shows. The date could
also be worthwhile.

But as I say - that's just my opinion and others may feel differently.


On Monday, June 8, 2009, at 01:39 AM, berlinirving wrote:

>
>
> I am working towards tidying up the labels of my JAM collection so I
> can post it for sharing on Mediafire.
>
> I have been sharing JAM episodes to people for many years on WinMX, and
> I've seen that some of my original analogue cassette recordings from
> decades ago (I still have the many dozens of cassettes) have ended up
> in collections that are on offer from people even now, which is good as
> I always wanted people to enjoy the shows. (Of course, many of my
> original analogues have been replaced by better quality digital
> versions from the ABC in recent years.)
>
> When I began sharing JAMs on WinMX years ago I devised a labeling
> system that I felt was quite efficient. Today it typically looks like
> this:
> Just A Minute #175 (1974-11-04; s09e08) WHAT I CAME HERE TO SAY (rec.
> online by dal).mp3
>
> My question now is whether this is what most people want. Considering
> the limitations of space, do you want the date? Do you care who has
> recorded it? Would you rather have the names of the speakers, or do
> these not matter either? Any other preferences?
>
> I have thought to simplify the title label; for example:
> Just A Minute #175 WHAT I CAME HERE TO SAY
> and the guests, date, and other info would be in metatags instead,
> which can be read by many mp3 players today. Or would people like all
> the info out in plain sight? If so, which parts?
>
> I'm interested in feedback about what most people actually want. Thanks.
>
>

 
<<<<   3206   >>>>

Back to the Top
 

Message History

 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
201910231211351191231414
201847218937951925514
20174342212172041923442316
201613493957608710322412923
201551973249415420280143116
201497568332833528251323879
2013463251988781192889886385427
2012921211801991258871155118166125144
20111127871731342252521526218316563
20101421171539469496918382716875
200967454297901491107063423539
2008200120175120701098711571455838
2007165447132999557140118748812599

|   FAQ   |   Contact   |   Services   |   Terms   |   Privacy   |   Credits   |

[Page generated in 0.0833 seconds under 1.55% server load]

© 2012-2025 TVRDb.com. All rights reserved.