The Television & Radio Database

Home  
Members  
Join  
Search  
Listings  

Just A Minute

JAM Series | JAM Stats | JAM Today | JAM Group

Search the JAM Yahoo Group Archive:

 
<<<<   4087   >>>>

Re: My thoughts on the rules discussion

Messages in this topic: 4 View All
kj.naughtonMar 26, 2010
 
 
For what it's worth, my hunch is that the so-called "problem" of petty challenges is probably a result of the larger number of performers that appear on the show these days.

Like it or not, an appearance on JaM for a new performer is a chance to put yourself before a large global audience - remembering that JaM is on the World Service - and that they find it important to be heard. I think being skillful at JaM takes some practice so the best way for a new performer to make an impact is to be humourous rather than a making the more difficult "correct" challenges.

Being a success on JaM can lead onto more bookings for the lucrative comedy panel show circuit - the BBC are making more and more of them and even Murdoch's Sky TV are making them now...

When we had the four "regulars" then there was much less need for them to "sell" themselves on the programme. That and, of course, they were all more practised at the game and therefore (usually) had no need of the easier challenges.

I also remember Chris Neill (one of my favourite panellists) who (and I paraphrase) pretty much admitted that the main way he felt he could get involved in the show was to go for the bonus point. I'm not sure that's entirely true as he is a good "proper" challenger as well.


So, in my humble opinion, the rise of the "bonus point culture" or the "petty challenge" is simply a function of the way the show is moving. And, for the reasons others have outlined, changing the way points are distributed won't work as panellists don't play for points. The only way to go back to the old challenges is to go back to the old format of four regular players. And I'm not in favour of that.

Cheers

kJ

--- In just-a-minute@..., "deanbedford" <dbedford@...> wrote:
>
> Just posted on the blog... but also for here...
>
> The BBC's Feedback programme - http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/console/b00rbq34 and the Daily Telegraph - have had some fun discussing JAM's rules. I should weigh in.
>
> Essentially a man called Rupert Read from Norfolk is worried about trifling challenges, the repetition of words like "we" and "the", and minor hesitations, he thinks they break up the flow of the game.

 
<<<<   4087   >>>>

Back to the Top
 

Message History

 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
201910231211351191231414
201847218937951925514
20174342212172041923442316
201613493957608710322412923
201551973249415420280143116
201497568332833528251323879
2013463251988781192889886385427
2012921211801991258871155118166125144
20111127871731342252521526218316563
20101421171539469496918382716875
200967454297901491107063423539
2008200120175120701098711571455838
2007165447132999557140118748812599

|FAQ|Contact|Services|Terms|Privacy|Credits|

[Page generated in 0.0775 seconds under 2% server load]

© 2012-2025 TVRDb.com. All rights reserved.