Just A Minute

 
<<<<   4095   >>>>

Re: Rule Changes for JAM?

Messages in this topic: 19 View All
PaulMar 28, 2010
 

 
I don't think we should go into whether someone loses creditability or not, it suggests that some of us had it in the first place... It's much better to say: I disagree, or on the contrary, just to show that it's an opinion thing.

--- In just-a-minute@..., "Steve Kenrick" <steve.kenrick@...> wrote:
>
> > why single Sue Perkins out for that,
>
>
>
> Steven is right to single her out, because she is among the worst, if not
> THE worst offender.
>
>
>
> Robert, you lose all credibility if you try and compare the antics of La
> Perkins with those of Clement Freud's. The added value provided by Sir
> Clement's other contributions made his "pointless" interruptions pale into
> insignificance. Unfortunately for La Perkins, she doesn't have much added
> value, so her "pointless" interruptions are more obvious. To sum up, she
> isn't in the same league as Freud.
>
>
>
> The other thing about La Perkins that I find deeply irritating is that she
> is always trying to be "one of the lads". Lower her voice by an octave or
> so and you could believe she was a man. As she calls herself an actress
> amongst other things, you would think that occasionally she could get in
> touch with her feminine side.
>
>
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: just-a-minute@... [mailto:just-a-minute@...]
> On Behalf Of Robert Torres
> Sent: 27 March 2010 02:48
> To: just-a-minute@...
> Subject: Re: [just-a-minute] Re: Rule Changes for JAM?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> why single Sue Perkins out for that, the same could be said about
> practically anyone on the show, including the late Sir Clement Freud.
> During his later years leading up to his death, he seemed to make pointless
> interruptions all the time, many of which weren't all that clever and seemed
> always to be for a cheap point.
>
> --- On Thu, 3/25/10, Steven <stevenwickham@...> wrote:
>
>
> From: Steven <stevenwickham@...>
> Subject: [just-a-minute] Re: Rule Changes for JAM?
> To: just-a-minute@...
> Date: Thursday, March 25, 2010, 5:41 PM
>
>
>
> There are some players whose constant stupid interruptions for a cheap point
> when nothing has happened do spoil some shows... stand forward Miss Perkins.
>
> --- In just-a-minute@
> <http://us.mc540.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=just-a-minute%40yahoogroups.co
> m> yahoogroups. com, Robert Torres <bobbyshaddoe3004@ ...> wrote:
> >
> > I should think that they should reinstate the position that no challenges
> should be allowed for small words like 'we' 'he' she' 'in' 'on', etc. but
> even back then it was something of a slippery slope where sometimes they
> would allow it, sometimes they wouldn't. One thing I think they should
> definitely do is bar the challenge on repetition of 'I'.
> >
> > regarding the notion of having points taken away for incorrect challenges,
> that i'm not so keen on.
> >
> >
> > --- On Wed, 3/24/10, Mark <nylon@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > From: Mark <nylon@>
> > Subject: Re: [just-a-minute] Rule Changes for JAM?
> > To: just-a-minute@
> <http://us.mc540.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=just-a-minute%40yahoogroups.co
> m> yahoogroups. com
> > Date: Wednesday, March 24, 2010, 8:14 PM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > All they have to do is give a bonus point if someone finishes 60 seconds
> without a valid challenge.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 7:37 AM, delmelza <delmelza@yahoo. com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > found this via the British comedy Twitters
> >
> > http://www.telegrap <http://www.telegrap/> h.co.uk/culture/ tvandradio/
> 7505101/Rule- change-proposed- for-competitive- Radio-4s- Just-a-Minute.
> html
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 9.0.791 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2771 - Release Date: 03/26/10
> 07:33:00
>

 
<<<<   4095   >>>>

Back to the Top