The Television & Radio Database

Home  
Members  
Join  
Search  
Listings  

Just A Minute

JAM Series | JAM Stats | JAM Today | JAM Group

Search the JAM Yahoo Group Archive:

 
<<<<   4096   >>>>

Re: Rule Changes for JAM?

Messages in this topic: 19 View All
Steve KenrickMar 28, 2010
 
 

Of course it’s my opinion that anyone who thinks that Perkins deserves to have her performance compared with that of Freud loses credibility.

 

It’s always going to be a poster’s opinion unless the point of the post involves a fact that can be proven or otherwise.

 

Surely that goes without saying.

 

Ok?

 


From: just-a-minute@... [mailto: just-a-minute@... ] On Behalf Of Paul
Sent: 28 March 2010 10:43
To: just-a-minute@...
Subject: [just-a-minute] Re: Rule Changes for JAM?

 

 

I don't think we should go into whether someone loses creditability or not, it suggests that some of us had it in the first place... It's much better to say: I disagree, or on the contrary, just to show that it's an opinion thing.

--- In just-a-minute@ yahoogroups. com, "Steve Kenrick" <steve.kenrick@ ...> wrote:

>
> > why single Sue Perkins out for that,
>
>
>
> Steven is right to single her out, because she is among the worst, if not
> THE worst offender.
>
>
>
> Robert, you lose all credibility if you try and compare the antics of La
> Perkins with those of Clement Freud's. The added value provided by Sir
> Clement's other contributions made his "pointless" interruptions
pale into
> insignificance. Unfortunately for La Perkins, she doesn't have much added
> value, so her "pointless" interruptions are more obvious. To sum
up, she
> isn't in the same league as Freud.
>
>
>
> The other thing about La Perkins that I find deeply irritating is that she
> is always trying to be "one of the lads". Lower her voice by an
octave or
> so and you could believe she was a man. As she calls herself an actress
> amongst other things, you would think that occasionally she could get in
> touch with her feminine side.
>
>
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: just-a-minute@ yahoogroups. com
[mailto:just-a-minute@ yahoogroups. com]
> On Behalf Of Robert Torres
> Sent: 27 March 2010 02:48
> To: just-a-minute@ yahoogroups. com
> Subject: Re: [just-a-minute] Re: Rule Changes for JAM?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> why single Sue Perkins out for that, the same could be said about
> practically anyone on the show, including the late Sir Clement Freud.
> During his later years leading up to his death, he seemed to make
pointless
> interruptions all the time, many of which weren't all that clever and
seemed
> always to be for a cheap point.
>
> --- On Thu, 3/25/10, Steven <stevenwickham@ ...> wrote:
>
>
> From: Steven <stevenwickham@ ...>
> Subject: [just-a-minute] Re: Rule Changes for JAM?
> To: just-a-minute@ yahoogroups. com
> Date: Thursday, March 25, 2010, 5:41 PM
>
>
>
> There are some players whose constant stupid interruptions for a cheap
point
> when nothing has happened do spoil some shows... stand forward Miss
Perkins.
>
> --- In just-a-minute@
> <
href="http://us.mc540.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=just-a-minute%40yahoogroups.co">http://us.mc540. mail.yahoo. com/mc/compose? to=just-a- minute%40yahoogr oups.co
> m> yahoogroups. com, Robert Torres <bobbyshaddoe3004@ ...> wrote:
> >
> > I should think that they should reinstate the position that no
challenges
> should be allowed for small words like 'we' 'he' she' 'in' 'on', etc. but
> even back then it was something of a slippery slope where sometimes they
> would allow it, sometimes they wouldn't. One thing I think they should
> definitely do is bar the challenge on repetition of 'I'.
> >
> > regarding the notion of having points taken away for incorrect
challenges,
> that i'm not so keen on.
> >
> >
> > --- On Wed, 3/24/10, Mark <nylon@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > From: Mark <nylon@>
> > Subject: Re: [just-a-minute] Rule Changes for JAM?
> > To: just-a-minute@
> <
href="http://us.mc540.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=just-a-minute%40yahoogroups.co">http://us.mc540. mail.yahoo. com/mc/compose? to=just-a- minute%40yahoogr oups.co
> m> yahoogroups. com
> > Date: Wednesday, March 24, 2010, 8:14 PM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > All they have to do is give a bonus point if someone finishes 60
seconds
> without a valid challenge.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 7:37 AM, delmelza <delmelza@yahoo. com>
wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > found this via the British comedy Twitters
> >
> > http://www.telegrap <
href="http://www.telegrap/">http://www.telegrap /> h.co.uk/culture/ tvandradio/
> 7505101/Rule- change-proposed- for-competitive- Radio-4s- Just-a-Minute.
> html
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 9.0.791 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2771 - Release Date: 03/26/10
> 07:33:00
>

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.791 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2773 - Release Date: 03/27/10 20:32:00


 
<<<<   4096   >>>>

Back to the Top
 

Message History

 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
201910231211351191231414
201847218937951925514
20174342212172041923442316
201613493957608710322412923
201551973249415420280143116
201497568332833528251323879
2013463251988781192889886385427
2012921211801991258871155118166125144
20111127871731342252521526218316563
20101421171539469496918382716875
200967454297901491107063423539
2008200120175120701098711571455838
2007165447132999557140118748812599

|FAQ|Contact|Services|Terms|Privacy|Credits|

[Page generated in 0.0821 seconds under 2.67% server load]

© 2012-2025 TVRDb.com. All rights reserved.