Just A Minute

 
<<<<   4098   >>>>

Re: Rule Changes for JAM?

Messages in this topic: 19 View All
Steve KenrickMar 29, 2010
 

 
Thanks for your opinion Espen.

I had to smile at the irony of you mailing to the list rather than me
directly.

I suppose we all want our words of wisdom to be read by the masses.

-----Original Message-----
From: Espen K [mailto:beamboom@...] On Behalf Of Espen Krømke
Sent: 29 March 2010 16:50
Cc: Steve Kenrick
Subject: Re: [just-a-minute] Re: Rule Changes for JAM?

And this is the point in the discussion where you should have
self-credibility enough to take this bickering OFF the list and mail the
victim directly.



Den 28. mars 2010 11:50, skrev Steve Kenrick:

>
>
> Of course it’s my opinion that anyone who thinks that Perkins deserves
> to have her performance compared with that of Freud loses credibility.
>
>
>
> It’s always going to be a poster’s opinion unless the point of the post
> involves a fact that can be proven or otherwise.
>
>
>
> Surely that goes without saying.
>
>
>
> Ok?
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *From:* just-a-minute@...
> [mailto:just-a-minute@...] *On Behalf Of *Paul
> *Sent:* 28 March 2010 10:43
> *To:* just-a-minute@...
> *Subject:* [just-a-minute] Re: Rule Changes for JAM?
>
>
>
>
>
> I don't think we should go into whether someone loses creditability or
> not, it suggests that some of us had it in the first place... It's much
> better to say: I disagree, or on the contrary, just to show that it's an
> opinion thing.
>
> --- In just-a-minute@...
> <mailto:just-a-minute%40yahoogroups.com>, "Steve Kenrick"
> <steve.kenrick@...> wrote:
>>
>> > why single Sue Perkins out for that,
>>
>>
>>
>> Steven is right to single her out, because she is among the worst, if not
>> THE worst offender.
>>
>>
>>
>> Robert, you lose all credibility if you try and compare the antics of La
>> Perkins with those of Clement Freud's. The added value provided by Sir
>> Clement's other contributions made his "pointless" interruptions pale

into

>> insignificance. Unfortunately for La Perkins, she doesn't have much added
>> value, so her "pointless" interruptions are more obvious. To sum up, she
>> isn't in the same league as Freud.
>>
>>
>>
>> The other thing about La Perkins that I find deeply irritating is that

she

>> is always trying to be "one of the lads". Lower her voice by an octave or
>> so and you could believe she was a man. As she calls herself an actress
>> amongst other things, you would think that occasionally she could get in
>> touch with her feminine side.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _____
>>
>> From: just-a-minute@...
> <mailto:just-a-minute%40yahoogroups.com>
> [mailto:just-a-minute@...
> <mailto:just-a-minute%40yahoogroups.com>]
>> On Behalf Of Robert Torres
>> Sent: 27 March 2010 02:48
>> To: just-a-minute@...

<mailto:just-a-minute%40yahoogroups.com>

>> Subject: Re: [just-a-minute] Re: Rule Changes for JAM?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> why single Sue Perkins out for that, the same could be said about
>> practically anyone on the show, including the late Sir Clement Freud.
>> During his later years leading up to his death, he seemed to make

pointless

>> interruptions all the time, many of which weren't all that clever and
> seemed
>> always to be for a cheap point.
>>
>> --- On Thu, 3/25/10, Steven <stevenwickham@...> wrote:
>>
>>
>> From: Steven <stevenwickham@...>
>> Subject: [just-a-minute] Re: Rule Changes for JAM?
>> To: just-a-minute@...

<mailto:just-a-minute%40yahoogroups.com>

>> Date: Thursday, March 25, 2010, 5:41 PM
>>
>>
>>
>> There are some players whose constant stupid interruptions for a cheap
> point
>> when nothing has happened do spoil some shows... stand forward Miss
> Perkins.
>>
>> --- In just-a-minute@
>>

<http://us.mc540.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=just-a-minute%40yahoogroups.co
<http://us.mc540.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=just-a-minute%40yahoogroups.co

>
>> m> yahoogroups. com, Robert Torres <bobbyshaddoe3004@ ...> wrote:
>> >
>> > I should think that they should reinstate the position that no

challenges

>> should be allowed for small words like 'we' 'he' she' 'in' 'on', etc.

but

>> even back then it was something of a slippery slope where sometimes they
>> would allow it, sometimes they wouldn't. One thing I think they should
>> definitely do is bar the challenge on repetition of 'I'.
>> >
>> > regarding the notion of having points taken away for incorrect
> challenges,
>> that i'm not so keen on.
>> >
>> >
>> > --- On Wed, 3/24/10, Mark <nylon@> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > From: Mark <nylon@>
>> > Subject: Re: [just-a-minute] Rule Changes for JAM?
>> > To: just-a-minute@
>>

<http://us.mc540.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=just-a-minute%40yahoogroups.co
<http://us.mc540.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=just-a-minute%40yahoogroups.co

>
>> m> yahoogroups. com
>> > Date: Wednesday, March 24, 2010, 8:14 PM
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > All they have to do is give a bonus point if someone finishes 60

seconds

>> without a valid challenge.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 7:37 AM, delmelza <delmelza@yahoo. com> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > found this via the British comedy Twitters
>> >
>> > http://www.telegrap <http://www.telegrap/ <http://www.telegrap/>>
> h.co.uk/culture/ tvandradio/
>> 7505101/Rule- change-proposed- for-competitive- Radio-4s- Just-a-Minute.
>> html
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 9.0.791 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2771 - Release Date: 03/26/10
>> 07:33:00
>>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 9.0.791 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2773 - Release Date: 03/27/10
> 20:32:00
>
>

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.791 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2777 - Release Date: 03/29/10
07:32:00

 
<<<<   4098   >>>>

Back to the Top