KW: General Monk is the man whose statue should be outside the Houses of Parliament; not that filthy regicide Cromwell. He was the one who went across the Channel and said to Charles I, rightful heir, “Come back, we want you,” and thus you have the Restoration. The cheering with Monk, all the way from Dover as they hailed this new age, and what did it mean? Well, there was Nell Gwyn with oranges, wasn’t there, and then there was that Chelsea lot, the pensioners ((BUZZ)) still in it today.
So I for one would not take more out of the surviving recording than my car cassette player ate out of it (after I wrote the transcript), as what ever, it still makes no sense. I would not want use to stop looking for those missing seconds of speech.
Dave
I've received the recording and to those who may wonder, the sound is
good as it is in my opinion. No need to spend a lot of time to tweak it.
The only thing I will do is probably just to even out some flickering in
the left/right channels at a few spots, and some other minor repair on a
few short (< 0.2s) segments.
However, regarding the missing Williams speech in the middle of the
recording: It is possible to *remove* a second or two of his speech and
thus splice two sentences into one and create a sentence that makes
sense, thereby camouflaging the missing part better, but is this wanted,
or do you all want every little piece of what there is available? What
do you think?
His words will go from something like:
"General Munk is the man whose statue should be outside <cut> ...with
their oranges, wasn't there and then there was that Chelsea lad whose
tension <beep>" (challenged) (etc)
... to:
"General Munk is the man and then there was that Chelsea lad whose
tension <beep>" (challenged) (etc)
On 02/04/11 17:59, Mark Hush wrote:
> We now have a copy of the tape transferred to the computer.
>
> The next step is to make it available to the group. This is where I
> will need the groups help. I have a MP3 version at 25MB and a WAV
> version at 275MB. These have had no post production processing done on
> them, just the files edited together to remove the start, joins of the
> two tapes, and end. I'm sure that these can be cleaned, although overall
> the quality is good considering the age, etc, and everyone has their own
> idea of what good sounds like.
>
> Suggestions as to how to make these available to the group please.
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Mark
>
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 10 | 23 | 12 | 1 | 13 | 5 | 1 | 19 | 12 | 31 | 4 | 14 |
| 2018 | 4 | 7 | 21 | 8 | 9 | 37 | 9 | 5 | 19 | 25 | 5 | 14 |
| 2017 | 4 | 34 | 22 | 12 | 17 | 20 | 4 | 19 | 23 | 44 | 23 | 16 |
| 2016 | 13 | 49 | 39 | 57 | 60 | 87 | 10 | 32 | 24 | 12 | 9 | 23 |
| 2015 | 51 | 97 | 32 | 49 | 41 | 54 | 20 | 28 | 0 | 14 | 31 | 16 |
| 2014 | 9 | 75 | 68 | 33 | 28 | 33 | 52 | 82 | 51 | 32 | 38 | 79 |
| 2013 | 463 | 251 | 98 | 87 | 81 | 192 | 88 | 98 | 86 | 38 | 54 | 27 |
| 2012 | 92 | 121 | 180 | 199 | 125 | 88 | 71 | 155 | 118 | 166 | 125 | 144 |
| 2011 | 112 | 78 | 71 | 73 | 134 | 225 | 252 | 152 | 62 | 183 | 165 | 63 |
| 2010 | 142 | 117 | 153 | 94 | 69 | 49 | 69 | 183 | 82 | 71 | 68 | 75 |
| 2009 | 67 | 45 | 42 | 97 | 90 | 149 | 110 | 70 | 63 | 42 | 35 | 39 |
| 2008 | 200 | 120 | 175 | 120 | 70 | 109 | 87 | 115 | 71 | 45 | 58 | 38 |
| 2007 | 165 | 447 | 132 | 99 | 95 | 57 | 140 | 118 | 74 | 88 | 125 | 99 |
| FAQ | Contact | Services | Terms | Privacy | Credits |
[Page generated in 0.0825 seconds under 1.49% server load]
© 2012-2026 TVRDb.com. All rights reserved.