Just A Minute

---

From: Wayne Styles <wayne.styles@...>
To: "just-a-minute@..." <just-a-minute@...>
Sent: Monday, 2 July 2012, 21:47
Subject: [just-a-minute] Re:The Clitheroe Kid

Hi All

A bit of a long shot this? Does anyone have these episodes available? I forgot all about him until recently and if you have not heard him or seen him. He was a 4` 3" comedian from Lancashire UK. He played the part of a naughty school boy and got into many a scrape. It was always good clean fun with one liners a plenty.

Well can you help, thanks

From: Wayne Styles <wayne.styles@...>
To: "just-a-minute@..." <just-a-minute@...>
Sent: Monday, 2 July 2012, 20:57
Subject: Re: [just-a-minute] Re: Who will take over?

 

Hi All

Well Nicholas has been a mainstay on the show and keeps it moving along well. However, I dont want him to go down the same road as Clement and Peter Jones, who slowed down so much that listening to them sounding frail and not really with it any more makes me sad. It would be a shame if Nicholas was allowed to degenerate in this way..The BBC should start having guest chairmen to see what differences it makes to the show.

From: delmelza <delmelza@...>
To: just-a-minute@...
Sent: Monday, 2 July 2012, 19:29
Subject: [just-a-minute] Re: Who will take over?

 

Being an american I may not be as up to date on the uk presenters as some here but I think it's a good idea to chose someone the Panel can have a "Go At" now & then as that is an important part of the interaction between the panelist & chairman.

It doesn't have to be older like Nicholas' generation but still someone has some kind of quirk that the panel can use and has the abiltiy to take those kind of barbs. Just My Opinion.. Miriam

--- In mailto:just-a-minute%40..., "Espen Krømke" <espen.kromke@...> wrote:
>
> On 16. juni 2012 21:39, Wayne wrote:
> >
> > Hi All
> > With the inevitable retirement of NP as chairman of JAM, who could
> > possibly take over. I have been listening closely to Tony Hawks and he
> > seems to fit in nicely. He does not take himself to seriously, he
> > understands the game well.
> >
>
> Totally agree on Hawks. He's humble too, and not a spotlight hogger.
> Plus he's intelligent and indeed understand the game and the rules. He's
> not the funniest or best *panellist* out there, but you don't need to be
> that to be a good chairman (Nick suck as a panellist for example).
>
> So yeah, I vote for Hawks!
>