Just A Minute

On 21 January 2013 06:28, Espen Krømke <espen.kromke@...> wrote:

 

Ok so I went through my collection of 90s recordings, and ended up with
an embarassingly long list.

Now I don't want anyone to spend an entire afternoon listening through
their collection for me, but I am hoping for someone to please check out
a couple of shows or so and tell me if you think you got the same
version or not.

Notice that I've added the file length of the different shows, as
further indicator if I we got the same show or not.

1990.04.07 - sneezes - 28.3mb - noisy, muddy sound, like an AM radio
1991.02.02 - telepathy - 22.1mb - very "thin" sound, sounds like a
mediocre 70s recording.
1991.02.09 - bags - 13.9mb - very poor, muddy sound.
1991.02.16 - A good part to play - 27.9mb - very thin sound again, like
telepathy above.
1991.02.23 - Biscuits in bed - 7mb - no intro, and very poor sound
1992.01.25 - This And That - 27.7mb - thin, muddy sound
1992.02.01 - What - 13.9mb - very muddy sound
1992.02.22 - Advertising - 13.7mb - very muddy
1994.01.22 - Norwitch - 14.2mb - very muddy
1995.02.11 - Dragons - 13.9mb - very muddy
1996.02.17 - Burns - 28.4mb - thin and muddy sound
1997.01.04 - The Scotsman - 7.1mb - very muddy sound
1997.07.19 - Manchester - 27.6mb - muddy and unstable, "AM radio" like sound
1997.08.09 - Flying By The Seats Of My Pants - 6.9mb - very muddy sound

The worst part is that I've not even listed all the poor sounding shows
of the 90s above, just the ones I found to be worst. I do worry if I'm
just being too picky here. :)

Thanks in advance!

--

Mark

mark@...

http://nylon.net