Just A Minute

On 22 January 2013 06:35, InnerRevolution7 <innerrevolution7@...> wrote:

 

I know the answer!!! (raises hand) Ok, its a crap guess....

I think it MAY be because the 90's is when people first started turning audio into MP3, and in the early days of doing that, some horrible errors were made in making small files, as people had tiny hard drives and were sharing with dial up. These days we can make reasonably small files that don't sound quite that bad. But some of those early MP3s are really horrendous. That might be why you see a quality dip in the 90's as things moved from audio tape to early MP3s.

--- In just-a-minute@..., Espen Krømke wrote:
>
> Thanks alot, Mark. I look forward to compare "Burns"!
>
> But this begs the question: How come the recordings we got from this
> decade is so particularly bad? Cause really, my list of shabby sounding
> recordings from the 90s could easily be doubled. I wonder why!
>
> Cause logically one would assume the quality rise as the recordings gets
> newer.
>
>
>
>
> Den 21. jan. 2013 02:31, skrev nylon:
> > G'day Espen. My results are much like yours, but I do have a jolly
> > good copy of 411 (Telepathy).
> > I've also removed the background hiss from 461 (Burns) but the
> > muddiness of the voices remains.
> >
> > Both are at http://nylon.net/up
> >
> > Hope that helps :-)
>
> >
>

--

Mark

mark@...

http://nylon.net