--- In just-a-minute@..., Don Judge <don@...> wrote:
>
> ...the beeb is clamping down on downloading?
>
> At the end of this week's JAM the announcer said that the episode is available to buy on CD and digital download, presumably from iTunes as I'm sure I heard some other programme would be available from iTunes for a fee.
>
> --
> Cheers
>
> Don __o
> \<,
> .....O/ O
>
On Thursday, August 15, 2013, charles_rooke wrote:Don - It was the same with the last series of ISIHAC. Sales outlets are advertised on the BBC's webpage for the programme. Thus "Available on: CD or Audio download From suppliers including: Amazon, AudioGO, BBC Shop, iTunes" on http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b006s5dp
Charlie
--- In just-a-minute@..., Don Judge <don@...> wrote:
>
> ...the beeb is clamping down on downloading?
>
> At the end of this week's JAM the announcer said that the episode is available to buy on CD and digital download, presumably from iTunes as I'm sure I heard some other programme would be available from iTunes for a fee.
>
> --
> Cheers
>
> Don __o
> \<,
> .....O/
>While it isn't great that BBC funds are being wasted on badly handled personnel issues, BBC funds are also being idealogically squeezed by government. The licence fee is frozen (which means a cut year on year in real terms), and the BBC are taking on the funding of things like the World Service- which means cuts in the money from everything else.
> Yep, possibly. Well almost certainly. The beeb seem to be wanting to make even more money than they already do, apart from the licence fee we ALL should pay. It will cover the massive overpayments made to managers.
> Oh well.
--- In just-a-minute@..., Wayne Styles <wayne.styles@...> wrote:
>
> Yep, possibly. Well almost certainly. The beeb seem to be wanting to make even more money than they already do, apart from the licence fee we ALL should pay. It will cover the massive overpayments made to managers.
> Oh well.
While it isn't great that BBC funds are being wasted on badly handled personnel issues, BBC funds are also being idealogically squeezed by government. The licence fee is frozen (which means a cut year on year in real terms), and the BBC are taking on the funding of things like the World Service- which means cuts in the money from everything else.
And then there's the profits from commercial activities that (and I freely admit I don't quite understand the logic behind this bit) are being channeled into private publishers instead of programme making.
So while it's a pain that the BBC are clamping down on filesharing etc, I don't feel I can criticise them.
(PS I'm sorry if you don't like people responding to a rant with a nice thoughtful & nuanced response- some people seem to take offense at that sort of thing.)
--- In just-a-minute@..., Wayne Styles <wayne.styles@...> wrote:
>
> "(PS I'm sorry if you don't like people responding to a rant with a nice thoughtful & nuanced response- some people seem to take offense at that sort of thing.)"
>
> Dont know who this is aimed at, as I am happy to see all points of view and in many cases change my views based on the "other side" which is helpful and healthy I feel.
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Simon <simon.jerram@...>
> To: just-a-minute@...
> Sent: Tuesday, 27 August 2013, 14:57
> Subject: [just-a-minute] Re: Could this be why...
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In just-a-minute@..., Wayne Styles <wayne.styles@> wrote:
> >
> > Yep, possibly. Well almost certainly. The beeb seem to be wanting to make even more money than they already do, apart from the licence fee we ALL should pay. It will cover the massive overpayments made to managers.
> > Oh well.
>
> While it isn't great that BBC funds are being wasted on badly handled personnel issues, BBC funds are also being idealogically squeezed by government. The licence fee is frozen (which means a cut year on year in real terms), and the BBC are taking on the funding of things like the World Service- which means cuts in the money from everything else.
>
> And then there's the profits from commercial activities that (and I freely admit I don't quite understand the logic behind this bit) are being channeled into private publishers instead of programme making.
>
> So while it's a pain that the BBC are clamping down on filesharing etc, I don't feel I can criticise them.
>
> (PS I'm sorry if you don't like people responding to a rant with a nice thoughtful & nuanced response- some people seem to take offense at that sort of thing.)
>
--- In just-a-minute@..., Wayne Styles <wayne.styles@...> wrote:
>
> "(PS I'm sorry if you don't like people responding to a rant with a nice thoughtful & nuanced response- some people seem to take offense at that sort of thing.)"
>
> Dont know who this is aimed at, as I am happy to see all points of view and in many cases change my views based on the "other side" which is helpful and healthy I feel.
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Simon <simon.jerram@...>
> To: just-a-minute@...
> Sent: Tuesday, 27 August 2013, 14:57
> Subject: [just-a-minute] Re: Could this be why...
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In just-a-minute@..., Wayne Styles <wayne.styles@> wrote:
> >
> > Yep, possibly. Well almost certainly. The beeb seem to be wanting to make even more money than they already do, apart from the licence fee we ALL should pay. It will cover the massive overpayments made to managers.
> > Oh well.
>
> While it isn't great that BBC funds are being wasted on badly handled personnel issues, BBC funds are also being idealogically squeezed by government. The licence fee is frozen (which means a cut year on year in real terms), and the BBC are taking on the funding of things like the World Service- which means cuts in the money from everything else.
>
> And then there's the profits from commercial activities that (and I freely admit I don't quite understand the logic behind this bit) are being channeled into private publishers instead of programme making.
>
> So while it's a pain that the BBC are clamping down on filesharing etc, I don't feel I can criticise them.
>
> (PS I'm sorry if you don't like people responding to a rant with a nice thoughtful & nuanced response- some people seem to take offense at that sort of thing.)
>
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 10 | 23 | 12 | 1 | 13 | 5 | 1 | 19 | 12 | 31 | 4 | 14 |
| 2018 | 4 | 7 | 21 | 8 | 9 | 37 | 9 | 5 | 19 | 25 | 5 | 14 |
| 2017 | 4 | 34 | 22 | 12 | 17 | 20 | 4 | 19 | 23 | 44 | 23 | 16 |
| 2016 | 13 | 49 | 39 | 57 | 60 | 87 | 10 | 32 | 24 | 12 | 9 | 23 |
| 2015 | 51 | 97 | 32 | 49 | 41 | 54 | 20 | 28 | 0 | 14 | 31 | 16 |
| 2014 | 9 | 75 | 68 | 33 | 28 | 33 | 52 | 82 | 51 | 32 | 38 | 79 |
| 2013 | 463 | 251 | 98 | 87 | 81 | 192 | 88 | 98 | 86 | 38 | 54 | 27 |
| 2012 | 92 | 121 | 180 | 199 | 125 | 88 | 71 | 155 | 118 | 166 | 125 | 144 |
| 2011 | 112 | 78 | 71 | 73 | 134 | 225 | 252 | 152 | 62 | 183 | 165 | 63 |
| 2010 | 142 | 117 | 153 | 94 | 69 | 49 | 69 | 183 | 82 | 71 | 68 | 75 |
| 2009 | 67 | 45 | 42 | 97 | 90 | 149 | 110 | 70 | 63 | 42 | 35 | 39 |
| 2008 | 200 | 120 | 175 | 120 | 70 | 109 | 87 | 115 | 71 | 45 | 58 | 38 |
| 2007 | 165 | 447 | 132 | 99 | 95 | 57 | 140 | 118 | 74 | 88 | 125 | 99 |
| FAQ | Contact | Services | Terms | Privacy | Credits |
[Page generated in 0.0828 seconds under 1.36% server load]
© 2012-2025 TVRDb.com. All rights reserved.