The Television & Radio Database

Home  
Members  
Join  
Search  
Listings  

Just A Minute

JAM Series | JAM Stats | JAM Today | JAM Group

Search the JAM Yahoo Group Archive:

 
<<<<   9398   >>>>

Topic: full minutes = real minutes

Message 1 / 11
Jeremy KeensSep 5, 2013
 
 
Hi

I was wondering if anyone has data-mined Dean's transcripts to find out how many full minutes were actually correct as per the rules (not repetition in particular; deviation is very subjective and hesitation harder to judge on a transcript) rather than being uninterrupted minutes. i was wondering because while listening to Paul's minute during porridge I felt that there were a couple of egregious repetitions (not little words but nouns if I remember right) which would generally be picked up.

On the flip side there are, of course, those interrupted minutes where it is an incorrect (particularly humorous ones) challenge  here the speaker obviously has the advantage of a break (though also the disadvantage of broken flow).

Anyway - about to listen to the recent triple minute with critical ears (thanks jamjar)

Jeremy

 
<<<<   9406   >>>>

Topic: Re: full minutes = real minutes

Message 2 / 11
simonbkellySep 9, 2013
 
 
I wouldn't be surprised if every uninterrupted minute includes some form of repetition, deviation and/or hesitation. Most of the minutes I've listened to definitely break one or more of the rules!

In fact, I was thinking of extracting the audio of every complete minute to create a JAM compilation. I've just got to finish listening to every episode first, though...

Simon

 



--- In just-a-minute@..., <just-a-minute@...> wrote:

Hi

I was wondering if anyone has data-mined Dean's transcripts to find out how many full minutes were actually correct as per the rules (not repetition in particular; deviation is very subjective and hesitation harder to judge on a transcript) rather than being uninterrupted minutes. i was wondering because while listening to Paul's minute during porridge I felt that there were a couple of egregious repetitions (not little words but nouns if I remember right) which would generally be picked up.

On the flip side there are, of course, those interrupted minutes where it is an incorrect (particularly humorous ones) challenge  here the speaker obviously has the advantage of a break (though also the disadvantage of broken flow).

Anyway - about to listen to the recent triple minute with critical ears (thanks jamjar)

Jeremy

 
<<<<   9407   >>>>

Topic: Re: full minutes = real minutes

Message 3 / 11
Wayne StylesSep 9, 2013
 
 
Simon
That would be an amazing listen and I agree that very few have not broken the rules in one way or another. I have listened to all of them available and the only one would be Clement that would come close, but even he slowed down quite a lot.

Interesting, tho


From: "simonbkelly@..." <simonbkelly@...>
To: just-a-minute@...
Sent: Monday, 9 September 2013, 23:12
Subject: [just-a-minute] RE: full minutes = real minutes

 
I wouldn't be surprised if every uninterrupted minute includes some form of repetition, deviation and/or hesitation. Most of the minutes I've listened to definitely break one or more of the rules!

In fact, I was thinking of extracting the audio of every complete minute to create a JAM compilation. I've just got to finish listening to every episode first, though...

Simon
 


--- In just-a-minute@..., <just-a-minute@...> wrote:

Hi

I was wondering if anyone has data-mined Dean's transcripts to find out how many full minutes were actually correct as per the rules (not repetition in particular; deviation is very subjective and hesitation harder to judge on a transcript) rather than being uninterrupted minutes. i was wondering because while listening to Paul's minute during porridge I felt that there were a couple of egregious repetitions (not little words but nouns if I remember right) which would generally be picked up.

On the flip side there are, of course, those interrupted minutes where it is an incorrect (particularly humorous ones) challenge  here the speaker obviously has the advantage of a break (though also the disadvantage of broken flow).

Anyway - about to listen to the recent triple minute with critical ears (thanks jamjar)

Jeremy



 
<<<<   9412   >>>>

Topic: Re: full minutes = real minutes

Message 4 / 11
simonbkellySep 11, 2013
 
 
Just finished listening to all available episodes from Series 1 and 2 so thought I would start on this project today.

There are four complete minutes from Series 1 and only one from Series 2 so my first compilation combines these five. These "minuteers" were:

s01e05 Andree Melly
s01e07 Aimi MacDonald
s01e07 Clement Freud
s01e08 Derek Nimmo
s02e05 Kenneth Williams

Here's the audio for anyone interested:
http://www.mediafire.com/listen/eidxlec46r7t121

As you can hear, they all break the rules and would most certainly have been challenged by the current crop of players!

Simon
 
<<<<   9414   >>>>

Topic: Re: full minutes = real minutes

Message 5 / 11
Don JudgeSep 11, 2013
 
 
And to put the counter argument...
How many times has a perfect minute been spoilt by an incorrect challenge?
 



From: "simonbkelly@..." <simonbkelly@...>
To: just-a-minute@...
Sent: Wednesday, 11 September 2013, 13:15
Subject: RE: Re: [just-a-minute] RE: full minutes = real minutes



Just finished listening to all available episodes from Series 1 and 2 so thought I would start on this project today.

There are four complete minutes from Series 1 and only one from Series 2 so my first compilation combines these five. These "minuteers" were:

s01e05 Andree Melly
s01e07 Aimi MacDonald
s01e07 Clement Freud
s01e08 Derek Nimmo
s02e05 Kenneth Williams

Here's the audio for anyone interested:
http://www.mediafire.com/listen/eidxlec46r7t121

As you can hear, they all break the rules and would most certainly have been challenged by the current crop of players!

Simon




 
<<<<   9415   >>>>

Topic: Re: full minutes = real minutes

Message 6 / 11
Jeremy KeensSep 11, 2013
 
 
Hi

And noted this in my original post.

To be stupidly pedantic, however, this is (obviously) immeasurable:
where an interruption is purely for humorous purposes it could be argued that the person may have gone on. But a challenge that was made honestly wouldn't count.
In either case an interruption gives the speaker time to regroup - and you would need to discount ones where they changed the direction of the answer.


And perhaps every minute could have been perfect, so the only ones you can be sure of are those where either the speaker stopped for humorous effect or they petered out and either stopped or beseeched interruption..

perhaps there are at least 6 categories of minutes (a non-minute is from the inital start to the first interruption)

actually perfect minutes {measurable}
imperfect perfect minutes {measurable}
humorously incorrectly challenged non-minutes that would have been perfect (or even imperfect) minutes (hmm - 2 subsubcategories?)
honestly incorrectly challenged non-minutes that would have been perfect (or even imperfect) minutes (ditto)
correctly challenged non-minutes {measurable}
self-defeating non-minutes {measurable}

Having done that I see we could actually count the number of minutes that were interrupted incorrectly and therefore could have been a perfect minute. Unless we can get wormholes to some of the parallel universes where these interruptions did not occur, we would not be able to say how many could have gone on to perfect minutes (and anyway, the number would not be valid, as the other perfect minutes may not have happened in those universes (Though if someone could do a recording from those universes where KW was still alive and PM somehow got on the show it could be quite interesting).

finally, before i get back to some real work, perhaps we could bring in some perfect minute classification

Golden minute - one where we can agree there was no rule breaking
Silver minute - OK, no-one interrupted but there was at least one infraction
Bronze minute - the sometimes 'gentlemanly' and often scurrilous practice of letting someone go on without interrupting

Jeremy



______________________________

On 12 September 2013 07:40, Don Judge <don@...> wrote:
 

And to put the counter argument...
How many times has a perfect minute been spoilt by an incorrect challenge?
 


Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (5)
.



 
<<<<   9416   >>>>

Topic: Re: full minutes = real minutes

Message 7 / 11
MarkSep 11, 2013
 
 
Give me an actual,  real, perfect, honest minute to think about this...


On 12 September 2013 10:41, Jeremy Keens <jeremy.keens@...> wrote:
 

Hi

And noted this in my original post.

To be stupidly pedantic, however, this is (obviously) immeasurable:
where an interruption is purely for humorous purposes it could be argued that the person may have gone on. But a challenge that was made honestly wouldn't count.
In either case an interruption gives the speaker time to regroup - and you would need to discount ones where they changed the direction of the answer.


And perhaps every minute could have been perfect, so the only ones you can be sure of are those where either the speaker stopped for humorous effect or they petered out and either stopped or beseeched interruption..

perhaps there are at least 6 categories of minutes (a non-minute is from the inital start to the first interruption)

actually perfect minutes {measurable}
imperfect perfect minutes {measurable}
humorously incorrectly challenged non-minutes that would have been perfect (or even imperfect) minutes (hmm - 2 subsubcategories?)
honestly incorrectly challenged non-minutes that would have been perfect (or even imperfect) minutes (ditto)
correctly challenged non-minutes {measurable}
self-defeating non-minutes {measurable}

Having done that I see we could actually count the number of minutes that were interrupted incorrectly and therefore could have been a perfect minute. Unless we can get wormholes to some of the parallel universes where these interruptions did not occur, we would not be able to say how many could have gone on to perfect minutes (and anyway, the number would not be valid, as the other perfect minutes may not have happened in those universes (Though if someone could do a recording from those universes where KW was still alive and PM somehow got on the show it could be quite interesting).

finally, before i get back to some real work, perhaps we could bring in some perfect minute classification

Golden minute - one where we can agree there was no rule breaking
Silver minute - OK, no-one interrupted but there was at least one infraction
Bronze minute - the sometimes 'gentlemanly' and often scurrilous practice of letting someone go on without interrupting

Jeremy



______________________________

On 12 September 2013 07:40, Don Judge <don@...> wrote:
 

And to put the counter argument...
How many times has a perfect minute been spoilt by an incorrect challenge?
 



--
Mark
JAM Jar - http://jamjar.nylon.net - see the JAM forum for login credentials
JAM forum - http://b9fx.com

 
<<<<   9417   >>>>

Topic: Re: full minutes = real minutes

Message 8 / 11
simon.jerramSep 12, 2013
 
 

I heard Nicholas's description of the first successful minute was good "Without being challenged by the others." It's the most sensible criterea IMO- the challenge isn't to keep within the rules, but to get away with it.



--- In just-a-minute@..., <sirnylon@...> wrote:

Give me an actual,  real, perfect, honest minute to think about this...


On 12 September 2013 10:41, Jeremy Keens <jeremy.keens@...> wrote:
 
Hi

And noted this in my original post.

To be stupidly pedantic, however, this is (obviously) immeasurable:
where an interruption is purely for humorous purposes it could be argued that the person may have gone on. But a challenge that was made honestly wouldn't count.
In either case an interruption gives the speaker time to regroup - and you would need to discount ones where they changed the direction of the answer.


And perhaps every minute could have been perfect, so the only ones you can be sure of are those where either the speaker stopped for humorous effect or they petered out and either stopped or beseeched interruption..

perhaps there are at least 6 categories of minutes (a non-minute is from the inital start to the first interruption)

actually perfect minutes {measurable}
imperfect perfect minutes {measurable}
humorously incorrectly challenged non-minutes that would have been perfect (or even imperfect) minutes (hmm - 2 subsubcategories?)
honestly incorrectly challenged non-minutes that would have been perfect (or even imperfect) minutes (ditto)
correctly challenged non-minutes {measurable}
self-defeating non-minutes {measurable}

Having done that I see we could actually count the number of minutes that were interrupted incorrectly and therefore could have been a perfect minute. Unless we can get wormholes to some of the parallel universes where these interruptions did not occur, we would not be able to say how many could have gone on to perfect minutes (and anyway, the number would not be valid, as the other perfect minutes may not have happened in those universes (Though if someone could do a recording from those universes where KW was still alive and PM somehow got on the show it could be quite interesting).

finally, before i get back to some real work, perhaps we could bring in some perfect minute classification

Golden minute - one where we can agree there was no rule breaking
Silver minute - OK, no-one interrupted but there was at least one infraction
Bronze minute - the sometimes 'gentlemanly' and often scurrilous practice of letting someone go on without interrupting

Jeremy



______________________________

On 12 September 2013 07:40, Don Judge <don@...> wrote:
 
And to put the counter argument...
How many times has a perfect minute been spoilt by an incorrect challenge?
 



--
Mark
JAM Jar - http://jamjar.nylon.net - see the JAM forum for login credentials
JAM forum - http://b9fx.com

 
<<<<   9430   >>>>

Topic: Re: full minutes = real minutes

Message 9 / 11
troubleshooter47421Sep 15, 2013
 
 
I like the definition Nicholas gives. Having a perfect minute to all ears is virtually impossible as some will judge deviation or hesitation differently from a different listener.

 



--- In just-a-minute@..., <simon.jerram@...> wrote:

I heard Nicholas's description of the first successful minute was good "Without being challenged by the others." It's the most sensible criterea IMO- the challenge isn't to keep within the rules, but to get away with it.



--- In just-a-minute@..., <sirnylon@...> wrote:

Give me an actual,  real, perfect, honest minute to think about this...


On 12 September 2013 10:41, Jeremy Keens <jeremy.keens@...> wrote:
 
Hi

And noted this in my original post.

To be stupidly pedantic, however, this is (obviously) immeasurable:
where an interruption is purely for humorous purposes it could be argued that the person may have gone on. But a challenge that was made honestly wouldn't count.
In either case an interruption gives the speaker time to regroup - and you would need to discount ones where they changed the direction of the answer.


And perhaps every minute could have been perfect, so the only ones you can be sure of are those where either the speaker stopped for humorous effect or they petered out and either stopped or beseeched interruption..

perhaps there are at least 6 categories of minutes (a non-minute is from the inital start to the first interruption)

actually perfect minutes {measurable}
imperfect perfect minutes {measurable}
humorously incorrectly challenged non-minutes that would have been perfect (or even imperfect) minutes (hmm - 2 subsubcategories?)
honestly incorrectly challenged non-minutes that would have been perfect (or even imperfect) minutes (ditto)
correctly challenged non-minutes {measurable}
self-defeating non-minutes {measurable}

Having done that I see we could actually count the number of minutes that were interrupted incorrectly and therefore could have been a perfect minute. Unless we can get wormholes to some of the parallel universes where these interruptions did not occur, we would not be able to say how many could have gone on to perfect minutes (and anyway, the number would not be valid, as the other perfect minutes may not have happened in those universes (Though if someone could do a recording from those universes where KW was still alive and PM somehow got on the show it could be quite interesting).

finally, before i get back to some real work, perhaps we could bring in some perfect minute classification

Golden minute - one where we can agree there was no rule breaking
Silver minute - OK, no-one interrupted but there was at least one infraction
Bronze minute - the sometimes 'gentlemanly' and often scurrilous practice of letting someone go on without interrupting

Jeremy



______________________________

On 12 September 2013 07:40, Don Judge <don@...> wrote:
 
And to put the counter argument...
How many times has a perfect minute been spoilt by an incorrect challenge?
 



--
Mark
JAM Jar - http://jamjar.nylon.net - see the JAM forum for login credentials
JAM forum - http://b9fx.com

 
<<<<   9436   >>>>

Topic: Re: full minutes = real minutes

Message 10 / 11
Wayne StylesSep 16, 2013
 
 
For me some of the best minutes have been when they all let them struggle on regardless. One with Peter Jones still has me in stitches.


From: "troubleshooter47421@..." <troubleshooter47421@...>
To: just-a-minute@...
Sent: Monday, 16 September 2013, 3:21
Subject: [just-a-minute] RE: full minutes = real minutes

 
I like the definition Nicholas gives. Having a perfect minute to all ears is virtually impossible as some will judge deviation or hesitation differently from a different listener.
 


--- In just-a-minute@..., <simon.jerram@...> wrote:

I heard Nicholas's description of the first successful minute was good "Without being challenged by the others." It's the most sensible criterea IMO- the challenge isn't to keep within the rules, but to get away with it.


--- In just-a-minute@..., <sirnylon@...> wrote:

Give me an actual,  real, perfect, honest minute to think about this...


On 12 September 2013 10:41, Jeremy Keens <jeremy.keens@...> wrote:
 
Hi

And noted this in my original post.

To be stupidly pedantic, however, this is (obviously) immeasurable:
where an interruption is purely for humorous purposes it could be argued that the person may have gone on. But a challenge that was made honestly wouldn't count.
In either case an interruption gives the speaker time to regroup - and you would need to discount ones where they changed the direction of the answer.


And perhaps every minute could have been perfect, so the only ones you can be sure of are those where either the speaker stopped for humorous effect or they petered out and either stopped or beseeched interruption..

perhaps there are at least 6 categories of minutes (a non-minute is from the inital start to the first interruption)

actually perfect minutes {measurable}
imperfect perfect minutes {measurable}
humorously incorrectly challenged non-minutes that would have been perfect (or even imperfect) minutes (hmm - 2 subsubcategories?)
honestly incorrectly challenged non-minutes that would have been perfect (or even imperfect) minutes (ditto)
correctly challenged non-minutes {measurable}
self-defeating non-minutes {measurable}

Having done that I see we could actually count the number of minutes that were interrupted incorrectly and therefore could have been a perfect minute. Unless we can get wormholes to some of the parallel universes where these interruptions did not occur, we would not be able to say how many could have gone on to perfect minutes (and anyway, the number would not be valid, as the other perfect minutes may not have happened in those universes (Though if someone could do a recording from those universes where KW was still alive and PM somehow got on the show it could be quite interesting).

finally, before i get back to some real work, perhaps we could bring in some perfect minute classification

Golden minute - one where we can agree there was no rule breaking
Silver minute - OK, no-one interrupted but there was at least one infraction
Bronze minute - the sometimes 'gentlemanly' and often scurrilous practice of letting someone go on without interrupting

Jeremy



______________________________

On 12 September 2013 07:40, Don Judge <don@...> wrote:
 
And to put the counter argument...
How many times has a perfect minute been spoilt by an incorrect challenge?
 



--
Mark
JAM Jar - http://jamjar.nylon.net - see the JAM forum for login credentials
JAM forum - http://b9fx.com



 
<<<<   9437   >>>>

Topic: Re: full minutes = real minutes

Message 11 / 11
Don JudgeSep 16, 2013
 
 
That's a very good point Wayne; after all said and done the show is there to entertain us all.
Nice one.




From: Wayne Styles <wayne.styles@...>
To: "just-a-minute@..." <just-a-minute@...>
Sent: Monday, 16 September 2013, 17:47
Subject: Re: [just-a-minute] RE: full minutes = real minutes



For me some of the best minutes have been when they all let them struggle on regardless. One with Peter Jones still has me in stitches.


From: "troubleshooter47421@..." <troubleshooter47421@...>
To: just-a-minute@...
Sent: Monday, 16 September 2013, 3:21
Subject: [just-a-minute] RE: full minutes = real minutes

 
I like the definition Nicholas gives. Having a perfect minute to all ears is virtually impossible as some will judge deviation or hesitation differently from a different listener.
 


--- In just-a-minute@..., <simon.jerram@...> wrote:

I heard Nicholas's description of the first successful minute was good "Without being challenged by the others." It's the most sensible criterea IMO- the challenge isn't to keep within the rules, but to get away with it.


--- In just-a-minute@..., <sirnylon@...> wrote:

Give me an actual,  real, perfect, honest minute to think about this...


On 12 September 2013 10:41, Jeremy Keens <jeremy.keens@...> wrote:
 
Hi

And noted this in my original post.

To be stupidly pedantic, however, this is (obviously) immeasurable:
where an interruption is purely for humorous purposes it could be argued that the person may have gone on. But a challenge that was made honestly wouldn't count.
In either case an interruption gives the speaker time to regroup - and you would need to discount ones where they changed the direction of the answer.


And perhaps every minute could have been perfect, so the only ones you can be sure of are those where either the speaker stopped for humorous effect or they petered out and either stopped or beseeched interruption..

perhaps there are at least 6 categories of minutes (a non-minute is from the inital start to the first interruption)

actually perfect minutes {measurable}
imperfect perfect minutes {measurable}
humorously incorrectly challenged non-minutes that would have been perfect (or even imperfect) minutes (hmm - 2 subsubcategories?)
honestly incorrectly challenged non-minutes that would have been perfect (or even imperfect) minutes (ditto)
correctly challenged non-minutes {measurable}
self-defeating non-minutes {measurable}

Having done that I see we could actually count the number of minutes that were interrupted incorrectly and therefore could have been a perfect minute. Unless we can get wormholes to some of the parallel universes where these interruptions did not occur, we would not be able to say how many could have gone on to perfect minutes (and anyway, the number would not be valid, as the other perfect minutes may not have happened in those universes (Though if someone could do a recording from those universes where KW was still alive and PM somehow got on the show it could be quite interesting).

finally, before i get back to some real work, perhaps we could bring in some perfect minute classification

Golden minute - one where we can agree there was no rule breaking
Silver minute - OK, no-one interrupted but there was at least one infraction
Bronze minute - the sometimes 'gentlemanly' and often scurrilous practice of letting someone go on without interrupting

Jeremy



______________________________

On 12 September 2013 07:40, Don Judge <don@...> wrote:
 
And to put the counter argument...
How many times has a perfect minute been spoilt by an incorrect challenge?
 



--
Mark
JAM Jar - http://jamjar.nylon.net - see the JAM forum for login credentials
JAM forum - http://b9fx.com







 
<<<<   9437   >>>>

Back to the Top
 

Message History

 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
201910231211351191231414
201847218937951925514
20174342212172041923442316
201613493957608710322412923
201551973249415420280143116
201497568332833528251323879
2013463251988781192889886385427
2012921211801991258871155118166125144
20111127871731342252521526218316563
20101421171539469496918382716875
200967454297901491107063423539
2008200120175120701098711571455838
2007165447132999557140118748812599

|   FAQ   |   Contact   |   Services   |   Terms   |   Privacy   |   Credits   |

[Page generated in 0.0768 seconds under 1.43% server load]

© 2012-2025 TVRDb.com. All rights reserved.