The Television & Radio Database

Home  
Members  
Join  
Search  
Listings  

Just A Minute

JAM Series | JAM Stats | JAM Today | JAM Group

Search the JAM Yahoo Group Archive:

 
<<<<   974   >>>>

Re: the next season

Messages in this topic: 17 View All
bobbyshaddoe3004Jun 22, 2007
 
 
well, more often than not the people on the show are the ones that
trip themselves up when they're speaking, and the interruptions
themselves are often just as funny as whatever it is that someone is
saying on the show or in their speaking time.



--- In just-a-minute@..., Dean Bedford <dbedford@...>
wrote:
>
>
> On Sunday, June 3, 2007, at 10:37 AM, Dave wrote:
>
> > Some interesting insight on Radio 4's Feedback programme this
> > week explaining how the station's audience is mainly over 40 and
> > the way they use comedy to cross over to the younger and future
> > audience. They target the 6-30pm slot which is, of course, where
JAM
> > resides. Two women aged 34 and 56 (I think it was) were selected
> > to talk about two shows currently in that slot. They didn't really
> > like either but in passing they both expressed a great dislike for
> > JAM "God! It seems like its been going on forever!" etc.
> >
> > Lets hope the BBC look to a more representative cross-section
> > about what should stay as they experiement with this slot.
>
> Well in broadcast terms of course, 40 years is a hell of a long
time. I
> think the show has changed a lot in style over the years, but as
the
> format has stayed much the same I guess it could seem very
repetitive
>
> If you wander round the BBC website forums you do find people who
seem
> to really dislike the show. There was one a couple of months back
who
> said she couldn't understand the thinking behind the show and she
put it
> something like this. "Who was it who thought up the idea of
bringing
> together some of Britain's funniest people, people like Paul
Merton,
> Ross Noble, Stephen Fry and Graham Norton, you start them talking
and
> then have Clement Freud interrupt them when he picks up that
they've
> repeated AND".
>
> You think about it like that and I suppose it is hard to explain
the
> appeal of the show to some people.
>
> Just wondering how you'd (this is everyone not just Dave!) would
defend
> the show to this person. Let's not focus on whether there are many
> challenges on "and" - I'm more interested in hearing what you think
> about great comedians being stopped mid-flow, which is the basis of
the
> show after all...
>
> Dean
>

 
<<<<   974   >>>>

Back to the Top
 

Message History

 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
201910231211351191231414
201847218937951925514
20174342212172041923442316
201613493957608710322412923
201551973249415420280143116
201497568332833528251323879
2013463251988781192889886385427
2012921211801991258871155118166125144
20111127871731342252521526218316563
20101421171539469496918382716875
200967454297901491107063423539
2008200120175120701098711571455838
2007165447132999557140118748812599

|   FAQ   |   Contact   |   Services   |   Terms   |   Privacy   |   Credits   |

[Page generated in 0.0747 seconds under 1.62% server load]

© 2012-2025 TVRDb.com. All rights reserved.