>
> Hello all,I am 31, soon to be 32. Up until about a week ago, I was a
> total JAM virgin. I had never listened to a single episode. Frank
> Skinner mentioned on his radio show that he had just been on JAM which
> was "something to tick off his bucket list". This led me, for whatever
> reason, just to look up the show. I was aware of it, but something
> piqued my curiosity. Then, I saw that Nicholas Parsons is 90(!) and
> has not missed a show since 1967. I did a few searches to see if I
> could find more info and to find some old episodes. And sure enough, I
> found Dean's wonderful site (surely everyone's first stop for JAM
> online) as well as a pile of old episodes on a download (I've already
> forgotten the source!).
>
> I am not one to do things by halves. I didn't just want to listen to
> the latest episode or dive in with the Merton era, I had to start at
> the beginning in 1967. Indeed, I have been listening to all the
> episodes from this download from th! e first one. I'm now just at the
> start of 1973. I thought I'd use this thread to track some
> observations as I continue this journey.
>
> - While Clement Freud seems to be the one who uses "every trick in the
> book", it's actually Derek Nimmo who is the more aggressive and
> sharper challenger. On the 60s shows, he seems like the most fierce
> competitor -- at times it is almost as if he is bullying the female
> guests with his near-constant haranguing.
>
> - The times when Nicholas is on the panel, I'm afraid, really
> highlights his limitations as a performer. At the same time though, it
> also shows how tough his job is: Clement is too strict as chairman,
> Kenneth is too lenient accepting every challenge.
>
> - Of the female participants thus far, Geraldine Jones has been far
> and away my favourite and perhaps also the best at the game.
> Wonderfully articulate woman who has a wit that goes under the radar.
> On the other hand, Nicholas's sucking up! to Aimi MacDonald is both
> cloying and cringe-worthy. Sheila Hancock is fiesty and gives Kenneth,
> especially, a run for his money, but I don't think she's as good at
> the game as Geraldine. Andree Melley has been too nondescript to make
> a real impression.
>
> - Kenneth Williams is not the same on the 1960s shows as he would be
> in the early 70s shows. It seems like it takes him some time to grow
> in confidence on the show, by 69 it's obvious that he's a fixture, but
> he's still quite reserved by his standards on those shows. There
> turning point, I would say, is Peter Jones's arrival. Listening to the
> shows in sequence, it is almost as if Jones being there flicks a
> switch in Kenneth. He becomes much much more adversarial, territorial
> almost. I do not know what it is about Jones that brought this out in
> him, but his performances in 1972-3 are borderline psychotic at times
> with his rants at Jones and at Nicholas. It's all in good humour, of
> course, and frequently very funny -- indeed, these shows are much
> funnier ! than the earlier shows -- but one gets the impression that
> Williams was also letting Jones know who was boss. I find this turn in
> Kenneth a bit puzzling because Peter seems like such a mild and good
> natured chap, but the difference in him after Jones's introduction is
> marked. It is unmistakable, I would say.
>
> - Speaking of Peter Jones, he is not at bad at the game as the various
> descriptions I've read make out. Does he get worse? While he's not
> been spectacular in terms of scoring points thus far, he's more than
> held his own. His put downs of Kenneth during their verbal sparring
> has been glorious. On one I was just listening to (Episode from
> 30/1/73), he brought the house down by saying he couldn't possibly
> know what the topic was from listening to Kenneth rabbiting on. Very
> funny.
>
> - Clement Freud seems to win every single game. His only real
> competition seemingly is Derek Nimmo. It seems to me that they mostly
> pair off Clement vs. Derek, Ke! nneth vs. Peter. Clement and Kenneth
> seem to have a tacit alliance. But all are united in their contempt
> for Nicholas.
>
> It's been interesting to see how the show has developed and changed in
> its first 5 years. I'm looking forward to getting to 2014 eventually.
> And I'll track my observations here as a I do.
>
>
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 10 | 23 | 12 | 1 | 13 | 5 | 1 | 19 | 12 | 31 | 4 | 14 |
| 2018 | 4 | 7 | 21 | 8 | 9 | 37 | 9 | 5 | 19 | 25 | 5 | 14 |
| 2017 | 4 | 34 | 22 | 12 | 17 | 20 | 4 | 19 | 23 | 44 | 23 | 16 |
| 2016 | 13 | 49 | 39 | 57 | 60 | 87 | 10 | 32 | 24 | 12 | 9 | 23 |
| 2015 | 51 | 97 | 32 | 49 | 41 | 54 | 20 | 28 | 0 | 14 | 31 | 16 |
| 2014 | 9 | 75 | 68 | 33 | 28 | 33 | 52 | 82 | 51 | 32 | 38 | 79 |
| 2013 | 463 | 251 | 98 | 87 | 81 | 192 | 88 | 98 | 86 | 38 | 54 | 27 |
| 2012 | 92 | 121 | 180 | 199 | 125 | 88 | 71 | 155 | 118 | 166 | 125 | 144 |
| 2011 | 112 | 78 | 71 | 73 | 134 | 225 | 252 | 152 | 62 | 183 | 165 | 63 |
| 2010 | 142 | 117 | 153 | 94 | 69 | 49 | 69 | 183 | 82 | 71 | 68 | 75 |
| 2009 | 67 | 45 | 42 | 97 | 90 | 149 | 110 | 70 | 63 | 42 | 35 | 39 |
| 2008 | 200 | 120 | 175 | 120 | 70 | 109 | 87 | 115 | 71 | 45 | 58 | 38 |
| 2007 | 165 | 447 | 132 | 99 | 95 | 57 | 140 | 118 | 74 | 88 | 125 | 99 |
| FAQ | Contact | Services | Terms | Privacy | Credits |
[Page generated in 0.0768 seconds under 2.12% server load]
© 2012-2025 TVRDb.com. All rights reserved.